PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IWDP.AS (iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CNDX.AS (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWDP.AS is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while CNDX.AS is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWDP.AS returned 2.95%/yr vs 21.38%/yr for CNDX.AS. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWDP.AS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNDX.AS.

Performance

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWDP.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDP.AS achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than CNDX.AS's 21.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IWDP.AS has underperformed CNDX.AS with an annualized return of 2.95%, while CNDX.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 21.38% annualized return.

IWDP.AS

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
7.91%
6M
8.11%
1Y
8.45%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
1.62%
10Y*
2.95%

CNDX.AS

1D
0.15%
1M
11.52%
YTD
21.89%
6M
20.33%
1Y
38.95%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
18.85%
10Y*
21.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWDP.AS
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		7.91%-3.33%6.79%5.38%-19.61%36.11%-17.19%23.60%-1.01%-2.62%
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		21.89%6.16%35.29%50.41%-29.90%38.80%35.83%40.51%4.53%16.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDP.AS and CNDX.AS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2011

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between IWDP.AS and CNDX.AS has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with IWDP.AS:
IWDP.AS vs. HPRD.LIWDP.AS vs. TREG.LIWDP.AS vs. VGOV.LIWDP.AS vs. HPRO.LIWDP.AS vs. BIRDXIWDP.AS vs. VNQIWDP.AS vs. SPY
Often compared with CNDX.AS:
CNDX.AS vs. QQQMCNDX.AS vs. CNDX.LCNDX.AS vs. CSNDX.MICNDX.AS vs. CSPX.ASCNDX.AS vs. ANXU.LCNDX.AS vs. IWDA.ASCNDX.AS vs. NQSE.DE

Return for Risk

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IWDP.AS
IWDP.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IWDP.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDP.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDP.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDP.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDP.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS
CNDX.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNDX.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWDP.AS) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IWDP.ASCNDX.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.77
2.49

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.14
3.29

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.44

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.82

-2.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

11.35

-8.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDP.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the CNDX.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDP.AS and CNDX.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IWDP.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

2.49

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.94

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

1.07

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

1.03

-0.86

Drawdowns

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDP.AS drawdown since its inception was -70.13%, which is greater than CNDX.AS's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDP.AS and CNDX.AS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IWDP.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.13%

-31.21%

-38.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-10.06%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.92%

-26.57%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.88%

-31.21%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.55%

-31.21%

-10.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.03%

0.00%

-7.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.78%

-5.45%

-10.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.40%

-0.81%

Volatility

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWDP.AS) is 3.54%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (CNDX.AS) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that IWDP.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNDX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IWDP.ASCNDX.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.25%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

10.70%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

15.52%

-4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.41%

19.73%

-5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.98%

19.61%

-3.63%

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDP.AS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CNDX.AS's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWDP.AS vs. CNDX.AS - Dividend Comparison

IWDP.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, while CNDX.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNDX.AS
iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWDP.AS
iShares Developed Markets Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		3.01%3.20%3.10%3.16%3.71%2.11%3.18%2.91%3.87%3.11%3.07%2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

IWDP.AS and CNDX.AS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CNDX.AS is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CNDX.AS is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IWDP.AS.

IWDP.AS is categorized as REIT, while CNDX.AS is Nasdaq-100. IWDP.AS tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while CNDX.AS tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IWDP.AS and 0.36% for CNDX.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWDP.AS and CNDX.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer