PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWDL vs. UJB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWDL vs. UJB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDL achieves a 42.20% return, which is significantly higher than UJB's 1.03% return.


IWDL

1D
2.15%
1M
6.40%
6M
29.25%
YTD
42.20%
1Y
68.31%
3Y*
30.93%
5Y*
16.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.76%

UJB

1D
0.58%
1M
-0.40%
6M
0.07%
YTD
1.03%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
5.79%
ALL TIME*
6.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$59.68K$87.17K$54.40K
$319.40K$2.11M$1.46M

IWDL vs. UJB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IWDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN
42.20%25.02%20.68%13.50%-21.27%40.35%
UJB
ProShares Ultra High Yield
1.03%12.22%9.41%17.70%-23.27%5.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDL and UJB is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.67

The correlation between IWDL and UJB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWDL vs. UJB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWDL
IWDL Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IWDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

UJB
UJB Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
UJB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UJB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
UJB Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
UJB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
UJB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWDL vs. UJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) and ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWDLUJBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.15

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

1.17

+3.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.46

4.79

+16.67

IWDL vs. UJB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the UJB Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDL and UJB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWDL vs. UJB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDL drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum UJB drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDL and UJB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDLUJBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.95%

-40.14%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-5.01%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.78%

-9.47%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.95%

-30.14%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.30%

-6.11%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

1.22%

+1.97%

Volatility

IWDL vs. UJB - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) at 1.67%. This indicates that IWDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDLUJBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

1.67%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.94%

6.03%

+10.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.34%

7.37%

+15.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.24%

14.67%

+15.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.82%

17.58%

+12.24%

IWDL vs. UJB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWDL and UJB have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

IWDL vs. UJB - Dividend Comparison

IWDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UJB
ProShares Ultra High Yield
3.20%2.61%3.02%3.92%0.05%0.63%2.88%3.95%3.22%2.67%2.35%3.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWDL and UJB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWDL has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to UJB (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWDL dropped -37.95% vs UJB's -40.14%.

On 5-year performance, IWDL leads with 16.51% vs 2.79% for UJB. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UJB has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IWDL has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWDL and UJB have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.00% for IWDL.

IWDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UJB is Leveraged Bonds. IWDL tracks Russell 1000 Value (200%), while UJB tracks Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and ProShares.

IWDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWDL and UJB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer