IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L
IWDE.L (iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LGGG.L (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - IWDE.L tracks the MSCI World 100% Hedged to EUR Index while LGGG.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IWDE.L returned 10.22%/yr vs 12.54%/yr for LGGG.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWDE.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGGG.L.
Performance
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWDE.L is traded in EUR, while LGGG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LGGG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWDE.L achieves a 9.63% return, which is significantly lower than LGGG.L's 13.17% return.
IWDE.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 7.50%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 21.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
LGGG.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 24.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- —
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDE.L iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) | 9.63% | 16.39% | 19.76% | 21.13% | -18.36% | 23.42% | 11.49% | 23.65% | -9.61% |
LGGG.L L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 13.17% | 7.03% | 26.97% | 20.59% | -12.97% | 31.56% | 6.30% | 30.82% | -29.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDE.L and LGGG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IWDE.L and LGGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Financial Services
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Industrials
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Healthcare
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Consumer Cyclical
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Communication Services
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Consumer Defensive
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Energy
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Basic Materials
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Utilities
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Real Estate
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWDE.L
LGGG.L
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWDE.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWDE.L | LGGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.69 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 14.77 | -3.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.32%, roughly equal to the maximum LGGG.L drawdown of -34.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDE.L and LGGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDE.L | LGGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.32% | -34.09% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -6.73% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.50% | -21.11% | +3.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | -21.11% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -7.71% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.68% | +0.20% |
Volatility
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Acc) (IWDE.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGG.L) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWDE.L | LGGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 2.58% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 7.92% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 11.06% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 19.69% | -4.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.26% | 21.20% | -5.94% |
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDE.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWDE.L vs. LGGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IWDE.L nor LGGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IWDE.L and LGGG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LGGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IWDE.L.
IWDE.L tracks MSCI World 100% Hedged to EUR Index, while LGGG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IWDE.L and 0.10% for LGGG.L.
Find the right allocation for IWDE.L and LGGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer