IWDA.L vs. PEX
IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net), while PEX is a Financials Equities fund tracking the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWDA.L returned 13.34%/yr vs 4.55%/yr for PEX. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for PEX.
Performance
IWDA.L vs. PEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWDA.L achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly higher than PEX's -10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IWDA.L has outperformed PEX with an annualized return of 13.34%, while PEX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.55% annualized return.
IWDA.L
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 13.34%
PEX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- -10.66%
- 6M
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- -11.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
IWDA.L vs. PEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.48% | 21.03% | 19.11% | 24.27% | -18.11% | 22.19% | 16.06% | 27.13% | -9.01% | 22.75% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -10.66% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDA.L and PEX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2013 | 0.53 |
The correlation between IWDA.L and PEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IWDA.L vs. PEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWDA.L
PEX
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
IWDA.L
PEX
-
Financial Services
IWDA.L
PEX
Industrials
IWDA.L
PEX
Communication Services
IWDA.L
PEX
-
Healthcare
IWDA.L
PEX
Consumer Cyclical
IWDA.L
PEX
-
Consumer Defensive
IWDA.L
PEX
-
Energy
IWDA.L
PEX
-
Basic Materials
IWDA.L
PEX
Utilities
IWDA.L
PEX
-
Real Estate
IWDA.L
PEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWDA.L vs. PEX — Risk / Return Rank
IWDA.L
PEX
IWDA.L vs. PEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) and ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWDA.L | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.88 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | -0.52 | +3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | -1.02 | +12.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWDA.L vs. PEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.11%, smaller than the maximum PEX drawdown of -49.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDA.L and PEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDA.L | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.11% | -49.17% | +15.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -24.72% | +16.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.94% | -24.72% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.88% | -36.58% | +10.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.11% | -49.17% | +15.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -19.26% | +17.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -8.23% | +3.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 12.67% | -10.65% |
Volatility
IWDA.L vs. PEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) is 3.96%, while ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that IWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWDA.L | PEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 5.26% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 13.35% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 15.89% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 18.01% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 19.45% | -3.53% |
IWDA.L vs. PEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PEX's 3.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWDA.L vs. PEX - Dividend Comparison
IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 12.55% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWDA.L and PEX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
IWDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while PEX is Financials Equities. IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net), while PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWDA.L and 3.13% for PEX.
Find the right allocation for IWDA.L and PEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer