IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L
IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ISWD.L (iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - IWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index (Net) while ISWD.L tracks the MSCI World Islamic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWDA.L returned 13.07%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for ISWD.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IWDA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISWD.L.
Performance
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IWDA.L is traded in USD, while ISWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISWD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWDA.L achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than ISWD.L's 19.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IWDA.L has outperformed ISWD.L with an annualized return of 13.07%, while ISWD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.76% annualized return.
IWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 9.83%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
ISWD.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 19.77%
- 6M
- 21.01%
- 1Y
- 37.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.83% | 21.03% | 19.11% | 24.27% | -18.11% | 22.19% | 16.06% | 27.13% | -9.01% | 22.77% |
ISWD.L iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 19.77% | 20.00% | 6.05% | 23.43% | -11.47% | 22.58% | 8.33% | 22.72% | -9.25% | 19.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDA.L and ISWD.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2010 | 0.80 |
The correlation between IWDA.L and ISWD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Financial Services
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Industrials
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Communication Services
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Consumer Cyclical
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Healthcare
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Consumer Defensive
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Energy
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Basic Materials
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Utilities
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Real Estate
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IWDA.L
ISWD.L
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) and iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWDA.L | ISWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.51 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 5.09 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.16 | 18.41 | -5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWDA.L | ISWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.93 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.81 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | 0.75 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.51 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.11%, smaller than the maximum ISWD.L drawdown of -48.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDA.L and ISWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWDA.L | ISWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.11% | -48.12% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -7.30% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.94% | -18.46% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.88% | -22.70% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.11% | -33.38% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -0.20% | -0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -4.70% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.02% | -0.05% |
Volatility
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) is 3.40%, while iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) has a volatility of 4.07%. This indicates that IWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWDA.L | ISWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 4.07% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 9.72% | -0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 12.65% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 15.46% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 15.67% | +0.24% |
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ISWD.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWDA.L vs. ISWD.L - Dividend Comparison
IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISWD.L iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.27% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.99% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 1.88% | 2.37% | 2.39% | 2.09% | 2.09% | 2.62% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWDA.L and ISWD.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISWD.L.
IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net), while ISWD.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWDA.L and 0.60% for ISWD.L.
Find the right allocation for IWDA.L and ISWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer