PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) and HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISWD.L is traded in GBp, while HIWS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HIWS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWD.L achieves a 20.37% return, which is significantly lower than HIWS.L's 21.56% return.


ISWD.L

1D
0.65%
1M
11.25%
YTD
20.37%
6M
20.71%
1Y
38.83%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
12.78%

HIWS.L

1D
0.80%
1M
13.23%
YTD
21.56%
6M
22.03%
1Y
41.15%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
20.37%11.58%7.85%17.25%-3.39%
HIWS.L
HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc
21.56%13.05%8.10%19.20%-3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ISWD.L and HIWS.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022

0.96

The correlation between ISWD.L and HIWS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWD.L
ISWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HIWS.L
HIWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) and HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISWD.LHIWS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.42

3.14

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.60

4.24

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.56

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.02

5.59

+1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.08

20.16

+3.91

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is comparable to the HIWS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWD.L and HIWS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISWD.LHIWS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42

3.14

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

1.22

-0.47

Drawdowns

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, which is greater than HIWS.L's maximum drawdown of -21.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWD.L and HIWS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISWD.LHIWS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-21.14%

-10.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-7.33%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-21.14%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-2.79%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.04%

-0.43%

Volatility

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) is 3.64%, while HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc (HIWS.L) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that ISWD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIWS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISWD.LHIWS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

4.50%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

10.08%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

13.08%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

13.72%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

13.72%

+0.61%

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWD.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HIWS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISWD.L vs. HIWS.L - Dividend Comparison

ISWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while HIWS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HIWS.L
HSBC MSCI World Islamic Screened UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.27%1.50%1.74%1.99%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.37%2.39%2.09%2.09%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ISWD.L and HIWS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HIWS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HIWS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISWD.L.

ISWD.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index, while HIWS.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Universal Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISWD.L and 0.30% for HIWS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISWD.L and HIWS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer