PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWDA.AS vs. AGGH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IWDA.AS is traded in EUR, while AGGH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGGH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWDA.AS achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 2.17% return.


IWDA.AS

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.60%
YTD
11.31%
6M
13.13%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
13.10%

AGGH

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.45%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.27%
1Y
8.99%
3Y*
2.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IWDA.AS
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.31%7.08%27.23%19.89%-7.51%
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
2.17%-4.61%8.71%5.22%-3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IWDA.AS and AGGH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022

0.03

The correlation between IWDA.AS and AGGH shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.16 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWDA.AS
IWDA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IWDA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

AGGH
AGGH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AGGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGGH Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
AGGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGGH Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWDA.ASAGGHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.22

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

2.33

+1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.95

7.03

+7.92

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWDA.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the AGGH Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWDA.AS and AGGH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWDA.AS drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDA.AS and AGGH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWDA.ASAGGHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-13.87%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-3.87%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.59%

-13.87%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-5.87%

+5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-6.28%

+2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.28%

+0.35%

Volatility

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 0.77%. This indicates that IWDA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWDA.ASAGGHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

0.77%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

4.60%

+3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.14%

7.81%

+3.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

10.45%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.01%

10.45%

+4.56%

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWDA.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWDA.AS vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison

IWDA.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AGGH
Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF
7.49%7.54%8.97%9.51%2.11%
IWDA.AS
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWDA.AS and AGGH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWDA.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWDA.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AGGH.

IWDA.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWDA.AS and 0.33% for AGGH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWDA.AS and AGGH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer