IWC vs. WNTR
IWC (iShares Micro-Cap ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Microcap Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IWC is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, IWC returned 48.46% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. IWC charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
IWC vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWC achieves a 23.21% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.13% return.
IWC
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 16.07%
- YTD
- 23.21%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
WNTR
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 18.08%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 120.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWC vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 23.21% | 38.19% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.13% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWC and WNTR is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.49 |
The correlation between IWC and WNTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.50 to -0.49 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWC vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
IWC
WNTR
IWC vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IWC | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 2.84 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.71 | 7.31 | +5.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IWC vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWC drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWC and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWC | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.61% | -42.65% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -42.65% | +30.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -10.15% | +6.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.21% | -20.53% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 16.58% | -12.76% |
Volatility
IWC vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) is 5.99%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that IWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWC | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 18.84% | -12.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.27% | 47.46% | -29.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.27% | 53.83% | -29.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 53.56% | -29.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 53.56% | -29.09% |
IWC vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
IWC vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
IWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.10% | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.18% | 0.78% | 0.98% | 1.19% | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.49% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 102.14% | 58.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWC and WNTR have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to IWC (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWC dropped -64.61% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs 48.46% for IWC. On fees, IWC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IWC has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs 48.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 0.98% for IWC.
IWC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IWC and 1.01% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWC and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer