PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWC vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWC vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWC achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IWC has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 11.35%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


IWC

1D
-2.09%
1M
2.88%
YTD
18.97%
6M
18.63%
1Y
55.24%
3Y*
21.73%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
11.35%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWC vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
18.97%22.45%13.63%8.99%-21.93%18.67%20.88%22.20%-13.13%12.79%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IWC and SLV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.20

IWC vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWC
SLV

Healthcare

28.1%

-

Technology

18.4%

-

Financial Services

18.1%

-

Industrials

13.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%

-

Energy

4.7%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%
100.0%

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.9%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Utilities

0.6%

-

Healthcare

IWC
28.1%
SLV

-

Technology

IWC
18.4%
SLV

-

Financial Services

IWC
18.1%
SLV

-

Industrials

IWC
13.3%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IWC
5.3%
SLV

-

Energy

IWC
4.7%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

IWC
4.4%
SLV
100.0%

Real Estate

IWC
3.5%
SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

IWC
1.9%
SLV

-

Communication Services

IWC
1.8%
SLV

-

Utilities

IWC
0.6%
SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWC vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWC
IWC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWC vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWCSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

2.62

+1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.76

5.64

+9.12

IWC vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWC Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWC and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWCSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.89

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.58

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.25

+0.07

Drawdowns

IWC vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWC drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWC and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWCSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.61%

-76.28%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-42.45%

+30.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

-42.45%

+12.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

-42.45%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-42.81%

-4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-37.30%

+34.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.28%

-44.67%

+29.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

19.67%

-15.92%

Volatility

IWC vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) is 7.29%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWCSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

16.30%

-9.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.26%

58.31%

-41.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.63%

58.90%

-35.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.42%

36.15%

-11.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.42%

31.84%

-7.42%

IWC vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWC vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
0.91%1.10%1.06%1.17%1.18%0.78%0.98%1.19%1.01%1.09%1.16%1.49%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWC and SLV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IWC (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWC dropped -64.61% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 11.35% for IWC. On fees, SLV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IWC has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SLV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IWC.

IWC has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IWC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SLV is Silver. IWC tracks Russell Microcap Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IWC and 0.50% for SLV.

IWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWC and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer