PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWC vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWC vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWC achieves a 21.41% return, which is significantly higher than IJR's 16.89% return. Over the past 10 years, IWC has outperformed IJR with an annualized return of 11.44%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.


IWC

1D
2.06%
1M
2.80%
YTD
21.41%
6M
19.33%
1Y
58.00%
3Y*
22.83%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
11.44%

IJR

1D
1.31%
1M
1.56%
YTD
16.89%
6M
15.84%
1Y
33.61%
3Y*
15.68%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWC vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
21.41%22.45%13.63%8.99%-21.93%18.67%20.88%22.20%-13.13%12.79%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
16.89%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IWC and IJR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2005

0.93

The correlation between IWC and IJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWC vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWC
IJR

Healthcare

28.1%
11.1%

Technology

18.4%
15.5%

Financial Services

18.1%
16.8%

Industrials

13.3%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.3%
13.4%

Energy

4.7%
5.9%

Basic Materials

4.4%
5.1%

Real Estate

3.5%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.9%
3.5%

Communication Services

1.8%
3.6%

Utilities

0.6%
2.0%

Healthcare

IWC
28.1%
IJR
11.1%

Technology

IWC
18.4%
IJR
15.5%

Financial Services

IWC
18.1%
IJR
16.8%

Industrials

IWC
13.3%
IJR
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IWC
5.3%
IJR
13.4%

Energy

IWC
4.7%
IJR
5.9%

Basic Materials

IWC
4.4%
IJR
5.1%

Real Estate

IWC
3.5%
IJR
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

IWC
1.9%
IJR
3.5%

Communication Services

IWC
1.8%
IJR
3.6%

Utilities

IWC
0.6%
IJR
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWC vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWC
IWC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
IWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWC vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWCIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

3.89

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.50

12.94

+2.56

IWC vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWC Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWC and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWCIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

1.93

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.28

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.47

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.44

-0.12

Drawdowns

IWC vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWC drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than IJR's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWC and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWCIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.61%

-58.15%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-8.68%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

-28.02%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

-28.02%

-12.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-44.36%

-2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

0.00%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-9.28%

-5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

2.60%

+1.15%

Volatility

IWC vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 4.42%. This indicates that IWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWCIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

4.42%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

11.71%

+5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.63%

17.51%

+6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.44%

21.41%

+3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.42%

22.90%

+1.52%

IWC vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWC vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

IWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than IJR's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.14%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
0.89%1.10%1.06%1.17%1.18%0.78%0.98%1.19%1.01%1.09%1.16%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWC and IJR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWC has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to IJR (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWC dropped -64.61% vs IJR's -58.15%.

On 10-year performance, IWC leads with 11.44% vs 10.68% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWC has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IWC.

IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.89% for IWC.

IWC tracks Russell Microcap Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IWC and 0.06% for IJR.

IWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWC and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer