IWC vs. IJR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IWC (iShares Micro-Cap ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - IWC tracks the Russell Microcap Index while IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWC returned 11.28%/yr vs 10.86%/yr for IJR. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.

Performance

IWC vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWC having a 22.59% return and IJR slightly higher at 23.01%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWC having a 11.28% annualized return and IJR not far behind at 10.86%.

IWC

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 2.38%
• 6M: 13.24%
• YTD: 22.59%
• 1Y: 47.18%
• 3Y*: 20.94%
• 5Y*: 7.55%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

IJR

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 3.18%
• 6M: 14.55%
• YTD: 23.01%
• 1Y: 33.63%
• 3Y*: 14.72%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 10.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWC vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF	22.59%	22.45%	13.63%	8.99%	-21.93%	18.67%	20.88%	22.20%	-13.13%	12.79%
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF	23.01%	5.89%	8.63%	16.06%	-16.20%	26.58%	11.28%	22.82%	-8.51%	13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IWC and IJR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2005	0.93

The correlation between IWC and IJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWC vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IWC	IJR
Healthcare	26.8%	12.1%
Technology	21.7%	15.4%
Financial Services	17.6%	17.3%
Industrials	13.3%	15.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	12.8%
Basic Materials	4.1%	4.5%
Energy	4.0%	6.0%
Real Estate	3.3%	7.3%
Communication Services	1.9%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	3.8%
Utilities	0.5%	1.7%

Return for Risk

IWC vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWC

IWC Risk / Return Rank: 77
IWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IWC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
IWC Martin Ratio Rank: 81

IJR

IJR Risk / Return Rank: 79
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWC vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWC	IJR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	1.94	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	2.85	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.81	3.89	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.32	13.04	-0.72

IWC vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWC Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWC and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWC vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWC drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than IJR's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWC and IJR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWC	IJR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.61%	-58.15%	-6.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-8.68%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.46%	-28.02%	-1.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.61%	-28.02%	-12.59%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.21%	-44.36%	-2.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.89%	-0.78%	-3.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.20%	-9.24%	-5.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	2.59%	+1.25%

Volatility

IWC vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) at 3.94%. This indicates that IWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWC	IJR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.79%	3.94%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.28%	12.00%	+6.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.14%	17.41%	+6.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.52%	21.34%	+3.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.46%	22.84%	+1.62%

IWC vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWC vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

IWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than IJR's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF	1.12%	1.44%	2.05%	1.31%	1.41%	1.53%	1.11%	1.44%	1.58%	1.20%	1.22%	1.48%
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF	0.98%	1.10%	1.06%	1.17%	1.18%	0.78%	0.98%	1.19%	1.01%	1.09%	1.16%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWC and IJR in my portfolio?

IWC and IJR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWC or IJR?

IWC has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to IJR (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWC dropped -64.61% vs IJR's -58.15%.

Which ETF is better, IWC or IJR?

On 10-year performance, IWC leads with 11.28% vs 10.86% for IJR. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJR has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWC or IJR?

Over the 10-year period, IWC has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWC or IJR?

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IWC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWC or IJR?

IJR has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.98% for IWC.

What is the main difference between IWC and IJR?

IWC tracks Russell Microcap Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IWC and 0.06% for IJR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.