PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWC vs. BRSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWC vs. BRSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWC achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly higher than BRSIX's 12.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IWC has outperformed BRSIX with an annualized return of 11.12%, while BRSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.


IWC

1D
-0.70%
1M
-5.03%
6M
12.92%
YTD
19.50%
1Y
48.46%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
11.12%
ALL TIME*
7.67%

BRSIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.25%
6M
8.92%
YTD
12.68%
1Y
43.07%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
7.51%
ALL TIME*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$9.94M$13.29M$20.50M

IWC vs. BRSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
19.50%22.45%13.63%8.99%-21.93%18.67%20.88%22.20%-13.13%12.79%
BRSIX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund
12.68%20.09%14.92%11.46%-23.43%-1.93%25.50%15.34%-17.23%12.29%

Correlation

The correlation between IWC and BRSIX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2005

0.95

The correlation between IWC and BRSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWC vs. BRSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWC
IWC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BRSIX
BRSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BRSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BRSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWC vs. BRSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IWCBRSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

3.34

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

9.75

+1.90

IWC vs. BRSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWC Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the BRSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWC and BRSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IWC vs. BRSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWC drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, roughly equal to the maximum BRSIX drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWC and BRSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWCBRSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.61%

-61.79%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.43%

-11.46%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

-30.80%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.61%

-52.26%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-54.09%

+6.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.31%

-8.71%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.18%

-15.58%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

3.93%

-0.02%

Volatility

IWC vs. BRSIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) at 3.82%. This indicates that IWC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWCBRSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

3.82%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.22%

16.02%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.13%

23.36%

+0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.46%

24.52%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

24.18%

+0.30%

IWC vs. BRSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BRSIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IWC vs. BRSIX - Dividend Comparison

IWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than BRSIX's 8.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRSIX
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund
8.56%1.03%0.62%0.89%2.12%1.32%3.46%1.30%16.12%13.71%8.25%12.77%
IWC
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
1.01%1.10%1.06%1.17%1.18%0.78%0.98%1.19%1.01%1.09%1.16%1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, IWC and BRSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IWC has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to BRSIX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWC dropped -64.61% vs BRSIX's -61.79%.

IWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWC and BRSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer