BRSIX vs. XLB

In the year-to-date period, BRSIX achieves a -11.22% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BRSIX has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 4.73%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 7.64% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BRSIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BRSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRSIX and XLB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BRSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than XLB's 1.96% yield.

The maximum BRSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.79%, roughly equal to the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSIX and XLB.

Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 4.73%. This indicates that BRSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.