BRSIX vs. XLB
BRSIX (Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both funds - BRSIX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by Bridgeway, while XLB is a Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, BRSIX returned 8.64%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for XLB. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BRSIX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.
Performance
BRSIX vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRSIX achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 13.09% return. Over the past 10 years, BRSIX has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 8.64%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.
BRSIX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 6M
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 55.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.16%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
XLB
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 13.09%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
BRSIX vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRSIX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund | 18.55% | 20.09% | 14.92% | 11.46% | -23.43% | -1.93% | 25.50% | 15.34% | -17.23% | 12.29% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 13.09% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BRSIX and XLB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.62 |
The correlation between BRSIX and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BRSIX vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
BRSIX
XLB
BRSIX vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BRSIX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 1.55 | +3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.75 | 4.73 | +10.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BRSIX vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRSIX drawdown since its inception was -61.79%, roughly equal to the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRSIX and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRSIX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.79% | -59.83% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -12.38% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.80% | -23.17% | -7.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.66% | -24.72% | -28.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.09% | -37.27% | -16.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -4.35% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -10.82% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 4.06% | -0.25% |
Volatility
BRSIX vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund (BRSIX) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 6.15%. This indicates that BRSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BRSIX | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 6.15% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.09% | 13.64% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.09% | 17.51% | +6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 19.02% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 20.67% | +3.53% |
BRSIX vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRSIX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
BRSIX vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
BRSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than XLB's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRSIX Bridgeway Ultra Small Company Market Fund | 0.87% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 2.12% | 1.32% | 3.46% | 1.30% | 16.12% | 13.71% | 8.25% | 12.77% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.67% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BRSIX and XLB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRSIX has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to XLB (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BRSIX dropped -61.79% vs XLB's -59.83%.
BRSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BRSIX and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer