IWC vs. ASCE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IWC (iShares Micro-Cap ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. IWC is passively managed, while ASCE is actively managed. Over the past year, IWC returned 48.46% vs 40.30% for ASCE. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IWC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.

Performance

IWC vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWC achieves a 19.50% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 27.10% return.

IWC

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -5.03%
• 6M: 12.92%
• YTD: 19.50%
• 1Y: 48.46%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: 6.69%
• 10Y*: 11.12%
• ALL TIME*: 7.67%

ASCE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 20.88%
• YTD: 27.10%
• 1Y: 40.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	$5.17M	$3.50M	$2.08M
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF	$9.94M	$13.29M	$20.50M

IWC vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF	19.50%	20.90%
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	27.10%	8.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IWC and ASCE is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.81

The correlation between IWC and ASCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IWC vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IWC

IWC Risk / Return Rank: 81
IWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
IWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IWC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
IWC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

ASCE

ASCE Risk / Return Rank: 84
ASCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ASCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ASCE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ASCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ASCE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IWC vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IWC	ASCE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	1.90	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	2.77	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.32	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	4.12	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.65	12.41	-0.76

IWC vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWC Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the ASCE Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWC and ASCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IWC vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWC drawdown since its inception was -64.61%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWC and ASCE.

Drawdown Indicators

	IWC	ASCE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.61%	-9.22%	-55.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-9.22%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.31%	-3.18%	-3.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.18%	-2.12%	-13.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.91%	3.06%	+0.85%

Volatility

IWC vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Micro-Cap ETF (IWC) is 4.63%, while Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that IWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IWC	ASCE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	5.61%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.22%	15.30%	+2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.13%	19.97%	+4.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.46%	19.63%	+4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.48%	19.63%	+4.85%

IWC vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

IWC vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

IWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than ASCE's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.17%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWC iShares Micro-Cap ETF	1.01%	1.10%	1.06%	1.17%	1.18%	0.78%	0.98%	1.19%	1.01%	1.09%	1.16%	1.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IWC and ASCE in my portfolio?

IWC and ASCE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IWC or ASCE?

ASCE has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to IWC (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWC dropped -64.61% vs ASCE's -9.22%.

Which ETF is better, IWC or ASCE?

On 1-year performance, IWC leads with 48.46% vs 40.30% for ASCE. On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IWC has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IWC or ASCE?

Over the 1-year period, IWC has performed better with a 48.46% return vs 40.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IWC or ASCE?

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IWC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IWC or ASCE?

IWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.17% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between IWC and ASCE?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IWC and 0.38% for ASCE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.