IVVW vs. QDVO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO).
IVVW and QDVO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IVVW is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Mar 14, 2024. QDVO is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on Aug 22, 2024.
Performance
IVVW vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IVVW vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | -1.13% | 11.71% | 5.95% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | -4.93% | 20.16% | 11.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVVW achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's -4.93% return.
IVVW
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 13.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVO
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -4.93%
- 6M
- -2.40%
- 1Y
- 21.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IVVW vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVVW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IVVW vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank
IVVW
QDVO
IVVW vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVVW | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.79 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.26 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | 2.13 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.59 | 7.94 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVVW | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.92 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between IVVW and QDVO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IVVW vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison
IVVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.78%, more than QDVO's 11.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IVVW iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF | 19.78% | 18.55% | 13.72% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 11.17% | 9.92% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
IVVW vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVVW drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVW and QDVO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVVW | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.79% | -17.75% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.21% | -10.24% | -0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -6.70% | +3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -2.51% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.75% | -0.87% |
Volatility
IVVW vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) is 4.54%, while Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that IVVW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IVVW | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 5.38% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.63% | 9.78% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 18.61% | -3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 18.01% | -4.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.10% | 18.01% | -4.91% |