PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVVW vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVVW vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVW achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return.


IVVW

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.90%
YTD
4.84%
6M
6.58%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVW vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.84%11.71%12.90%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVW and DGRO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024

0.65

The correlation between IVVW and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVVW vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVVW
DGRO

Technology

35.6%
19.4%

Financial Services

11.8%
21.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
16.4%

Industrials

8.3%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.5%

Energy

3.5%
5.6%

Utilities

2.4%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.5%

Technology

IVVW
35.6%
DGRO
19.4%

Financial Services

IVVW
11.8%
DGRO
21.2%

Communication Services

IVVW
11.2%
DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IVVW
10.1%
DGRO
5.7%

Healthcare

IVVW
8.5%
DGRO
16.4%

Industrials

IVVW
8.3%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

IVVW
4.9%
DGRO
11.5%

Energy

IVVW
3.5%
DGRO
5.6%

Utilities

IVVW
2.4%
DGRO
6.9%

Real Estate

IVVW
1.9%
DGRO

-

Basic Materials

IVVW
1.8%
DGRO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVVW vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVW vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVWDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.43

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.47

3.50

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.13

13.52

+5.61

IVVW vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVW Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVW and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVWDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.39

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.76

+0.31

Drawdowns

IVVW vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVW drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVW and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVWDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-35.10%

+18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

-6.47%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.28%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-3.44%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.67%

-0.62%

Volatility

IVVW vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) is 1.13%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.21%. This indicates that IVVW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVWDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

2.21%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

6.91%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.40%

9.48%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

13.82%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

16.62%

-3.96%

IVVW vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVW has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVVW vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IVVW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.70%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.70%18.55%13.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVVW and DGRO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to IVVW (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVW dropped -16.79% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 1-year performance, DGRO leads with 22.54% vs 20.07% for IVVW. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 22.54% return vs 20.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IVVW.

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.70%, compared with 1.96% for DGRO.

IVVW is categorized as Derivative Income, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IVVW tracks Cboe S&P 500 Enhanced 1% OTM BuyWrite Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IVVW and 0.08% for DGRO.

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVVW and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer