IVVM vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVVM (iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVVM is a Options Trading fund actively managed by iShares, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. IVVM is actively managed, while IWM is passively managed. Over the past year, IVVM returned 16.27% vs 39.10% for IWM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVVM charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

IVVM vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVM achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return.

IVVM

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 5.95%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 16.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVM vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	5.95%	14.24%	16.08%	5.17%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	12.66%	11.38%	8.07%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVM and IWM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023	0.73

The correlation between IVVM and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVVM vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVVM	IWM
Technology	36.2%	19.5%
Financial Services	11.9%	15.8%
Communication Services	10.9%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	7.8%
Healthcare	8.4%	15.8%
Industrials	8.1%	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	2.1%
Energy	3.5%	6.0%
Utilities	2.3%	3.0%
Real Estate	1.9%	5.7%
Basic Materials	1.8%	4.5%

Return for Risk

IVVM vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVM

IVVM Risk / Return Rank: 72
IVVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IVVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
IVVM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
IVVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IVVM Martin Ratio Rank: 78

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVM vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVVM	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.32	2.05	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	2.85	+0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.34	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	3.56	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	12.64	+2.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVVM vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVM and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVVM	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.32	2.05	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.49	0.37	+1.13

Drawdowns

IVVM vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVM drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVM and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVVM	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.62%	-59.05%	+47.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.31%	-11.03%	+5.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-1.49%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-10.77%	+9.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	3.10%	-2.04%

Volatility

IVVM vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF (IVVM) is 0.76%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that IVVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVVM	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	5.75%	-4.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.62%	13.53%	-7.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.04%	19.20%	-12.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.62%	22.52%	-12.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.62%	23.04%	-13.42%

IVVM vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVM has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVVM vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IVVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than IWM's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVVM iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF	0.65%	0.68%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVVM and IWM in my portfolio?

IVVM and IWM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVVM or IWM?

IWM has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to IVVM (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVM dropped -11.62% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, IVVM or IWM?

On 1-year performance, IWM leads with 39.10% vs 16.27% for IVVM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IVVM has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVVM or IWM?

Over the 1-year period, IWM has performed better with a 39.10% return vs 16.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVVM or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IVVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVVM or IWM?

IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.65% for IVVM.

What is the main difference between IVVM and IWM?

IVVM is categorized as Options Trading, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVM and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.