PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVVB vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVVB vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVVB achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.


IVVB

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.91%
YTD
4.57%
6M
4.37%
1Y
14.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDY

1D
3.39%
1M
46.76%
YTD
110.49%
6M
111.80%
1Y
240.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVVB vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVVB
iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF
4.57%9.60%18.66%2.52%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
110.49%53.93%-17.00%26.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IVVB and AMDY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.56

The correlation between IVVB and AMDY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVVB vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVVB
IVVB Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IVVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVB Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVVB vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVVBAMDYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

4.53

-2.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

4.54

-1.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.64

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

8.77

-6.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.94

19.77

-8.82

IVVB vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVVB Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVVB and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVVBAMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

4.53

-2.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Drawdowns

IVVB vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVVB drawdown since its inception was -13.08%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVVB and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVBAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.08%

-53.92%

+40.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-27.59%

+21.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

0.00%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-18.02%

+16.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

12.22%

-10.88%

Volatility

IVVB vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF (IVVB) is 0.74%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.81%. This indicates that IVVB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVBAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

20.81%

-20.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.49%

39.99%

-34.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.27%

53.40%

-46.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.28%

46.01%

-36.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.28%

46.01%

-36.73%

IVVB vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVVB has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVVB vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

IVVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
54.91%80.68%109.98%6.68%
IVVB
iShares Large Cap Deep Buffer ETF
1.17%1.22%0.87%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVVB and AMDY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to IVVB (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVVB dropped -13.08% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 14.57% for IVVB. On fees, IVVB is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IVVB has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 14.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVB is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 1.17% for IVVB.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IVVB and 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVVB and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer