IVV vs. SCHF
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.32%/yr vs 10.24%/yr for SCHF. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHF.
Performance
IVV vs. SCHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCHF's 12.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed SCHF with an annualized return of 15.32%, while SCHF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
SCHF
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 15.44%
- 1Y
- 28.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
IVV vs. SCHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 12.60% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and SCHF is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IVV and SCHF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVV vs. SCHF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
SCHF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
SCHF
Financial Services
IVV
SCHF
Communication Services
IVV
SCHF
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
SCHF
Healthcare
IVV
SCHF
Industrials
IVV
SCHF
Consumer Defensive
IVV
SCHF
Energy
IVV
SCHF
Utilities
IVV
SCHF
Real Estate
IVV
SCHF
Basic Materials
IVV
SCHF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. SCHF — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
SCHF
IVV vs. SCHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.47 | +0.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | 9.53 | +3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 1.75 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.57 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.60 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.43 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
IVV vs. SCHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than SCHF's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and SCHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -34.87% | -20.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -11.48% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -13.41% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -29.14% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -34.87% | +0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -3.39% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -7.38% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 2.97% | -1.05% |
Volatility
IVV vs. SCHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 3.77%, while Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | SCHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 6.09% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 13.94% | -4.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 16.25% | -4.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 16.48% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 17.23% | +0.84% |
IVV vs. SCHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHF's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVV vs. SCHF - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than SCHF's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 3.04% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and SCHF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to IVV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs SCHF's -34.87%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 10.24% for SCHF. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHF.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while SCHF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.06% for SCHF.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and SCHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer