IVV vs. RSPG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.54%/yr vs 9.73%/yr for RSPG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.

Performance

IVV vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 10.85% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 34.27% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed RSPG with an annualized return of 15.54%, while RSPG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.73% annualized return.

IVV

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: 10.85%
• 6M: 10.87%
• 1Y: 28.00%
• 3Y*: 22.43%
• 5Y*: 13.88%
• 10Y*: 15.54%

RSPG

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: 34.27%
• 6M: 28.95%
• 1Y: 47.49%
• 3Y*: 19.93%
• 5Y*: 21.10%
• 10Y*: 9.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	10.85%	17.85%	24.93%	26.31%	-18.16%	28.76%	18.40%	31.07%	-4.49%	21.75%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	34.27%	7.01%	6.09%	4.49%	57.97%	57.73%	-32.44%	13.38%	-24.68%	-6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and RSPG is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006	0.54

The correlation between IVV and RSPG shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVV vs. RSPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVV	RSPG
Technology	35.6%	-
Financial Services	11.8%	0.0%
Communication Services	11.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	-
Healthcare	8.5%	-
Industrials	8.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	100.0%
Utilities	2.4%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

IVV vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV

IVV Risk / Return Rank: 70
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 64
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IVV	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.20	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.80	+0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.35	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.92	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.71	11.59	+3.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IVV vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the RSPG Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and RSPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVV	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.39	2.20	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.75	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.29	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.18	+0.27

Drawdowns

IVV vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum RSPG drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and RSPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVV	RSPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.25%	-79.98%	+24.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-12.18%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.75%	-23.06%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.53%	-28.44%	+3.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	-73.17%	+39.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-5.67%	+4.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-25.47%	+14.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	4.11%	-2.20%

Volatility

IVV vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 2.87%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVV	RSPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.87%	8.19%	-5.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.90%	16.77%	-7.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	21.69%	-9.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	28.31%	-11.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	33.57%	-15.52%

IVV vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVV vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than RSPG's 1.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	1.06%	1.17%	1.30%	1.44%	1.66%	1.20%	1.57%	1.85%	2.21%	1.75%	2.01%	2.27%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	1.94%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVV and RSPG in my portfolio?

IVV and RSPG have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVV or RSPG?

RSPG has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs RSPG's -79.98%.

Which ETF is better, IVV or RSPG?

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 9.73% for RSPG. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVV or RSPG?

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVV or RSPG?

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVV or RSPG?

RSPG has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

What is the main difference between IVV and RSPG?

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPG is Energy Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.40% for RSPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.