IVV vs. RSBY

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. IVV is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, IVV returned 27.22% vs 14.13% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

IVV vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.84% return.

IVV

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 10.33%
• 1Y: 27.22%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 14.07%
• 10Y*: 15.53%

RSBY

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.06%
• YTD: 18.84%
• 6M: 19.11%
• 1Y: 14.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVV vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	10.10%	17.85%	5.57%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.84%	-12.98%	-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and RSBY is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.21

Return for Risk

IVV vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV

IVV Risk / Return Rank: 70
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 35
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVV	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	1.26	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	1.83	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.22	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.79	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.62	4.11	+9.51

IVV vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVV vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVV	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.25%	-23.32%	-31.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-7.95%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-6.20%	+4.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.76%	-13.57%	+2.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	3.45%	-1.48%

Volatility

IVV vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 1.93%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVV	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	1.93%	+2.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.82%	8.24%	+1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	11.30%	+1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	13.42%	+3.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.09%	13.42%	+4.67%

IVV vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVV vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than RSBY's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	1.09%	1.17%	1.30%	1.44%	1.66%	1.20%	1.57%	1.85%	2.21%	1.75%	2.01%	2.27%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.74%	2.07%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVV and RSBY in my portfolio?

IVV and RSBY have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVV or RSBY?

IVV has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to RSBY (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, IVV or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, IVV leads with 27.22% vs 14.13% for RSBY. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVV or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, IVV has performed better with a 27.22% return vs 14.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVV or RSBY?

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVV or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.

What is the main difference between IVV and RSBY?

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.