IVV vs. MDCPX
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and MDCPX (BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares) are both funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while MDCPX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by BlackRock. IVV is passively managed, while MDCPX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.47%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for MDCPX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MDCPX.
Performance
IVV vs. MDCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly higher than MDCPX's 7.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed MDCPX with an annualized return of 15.47%, while MDCPX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
MDCPX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 17.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
IVV vs. MDCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
MDCPX BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares | 7.08% | 15.32% | 12.47% | 16.59% | -15.70% | 16.49% | 15.07% | 21.59% | -3.48% | 14.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and MDCPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2000 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IVV and MDCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. MDCPX — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
MDCPX
IVV vs. MDCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | MDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 2.79 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.43 | 11.82 | +0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. MDCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than MDCPX's maximum drawdown of -41.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and MDCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | MDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -41.98% | -13.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -6.22% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -10.65% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -21.99% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -24.58% | -9.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -1.75% | -0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -5.09% | -5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.46% | +0.51% |
Volatility
IVV vs. MDCPX - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 4.37% compared to BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares (MDCPX) at 3.54%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | MDCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 3.54% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 7.28% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 8.74% | +3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 11.12% | +5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 11.49% | +6.59% |
IVV vs. MDCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MDCPX's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVV vs. MDCPX - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than MDCPX's 8.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
MDCPX BlackRock Balanced Capital Fund Investor A Shares | 8.04% | 8.61% | 7.44% | 2.63% | 3.82% | 12.27% | 4.02% | 5.25% | 7.84% | 19.39% | 4.67% | 5.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, IVV and MDCPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IVV has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to MDCPX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs MDCPX's -41.98%.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and MDCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer