PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. HEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. HEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 8.96% return, which is significantly lower than HEFA's 13.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed HEFA with an annualized return of 14.93%, while HEFA has yielded a comparatively lower 12.70% annualized return.


IVV

1D
0.10%
1M
0.80%
6M
7.81%
YTD
8.96%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
14.93%
ALL TIME*
8.41%

HEFA

1D
0.51%
1M
0.73%
6M
10.08%
YTD
13.57%
1Y
26.09%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
12.70%
ALL TIME*
10.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.23M$30.73M$26.09M
$3.37B$4.55B$5.92B

IVV vs. HEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.96%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
13.57%24.58%13.71%20.33%-4.86%19.59%2.09%27.63%-9.33%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and HEFA is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014

0.78

The correlation between IVV and HEFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVV vs. HEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVV
HEFA

Technology

38.4%
12.0%

Financial Services

12.0%
25.9%

Communication Services

9.8%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
7.2%

Healthcare

8.9%
10.4%

Industrials

8.0%
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
6.8%

Energy

3.3%
3.7%

Utilities

2.2%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.9%

Technology

IVV
38.4%
HEFA
12.0%

Financial Services

IVV
12.0%
HEFA
25.9%

Communication Services

IVV
9.8%
HEFA
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IVV
9.2%
HEFA
7.2%

Healthcare

IVV
8.9%
HEFA
10.4%

Industrials

IVV
8.0%
HEFA
18.9%

Consumer Defensive

IVV
4.5%
HEFA
6.8%

Energy

IVV
3.3%
HEFA
3.7%

Utilities

IVV
2.2%
HEFA
3.7%

Real Estate

IVV
1.9%
HEFA
1.7%

Basic Materials

IVV
1.7%
HEFA
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. HEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

HEFA
HEFA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. HEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVVHEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.77

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

11.52

-2.86

IVV vs. HEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the HEFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and HEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVV vs. HEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than HEFA's maximum drawdown of -32.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and HEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVHEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-32.39%

-22.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-9.52%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-14.28%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-14.79%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-32.39%

-1.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-1.12%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-4.13%

-6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.29%

-0.23%

Volatility

IVV vs. HEFA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) at 3.21%. This indicates that IVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVHEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

3.21%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

10.72%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

13.05%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

13.82%

+3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

15.66%

+2.39%

IVV vs. HEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than HEFA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVV vs. HEFA - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than HEFA's 4.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
4.04%4.40%3.09%3.02%25.14%3.06%2.10%7.56%4.58%2.55%3.17%3.54%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.10%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVV and HEFA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to HEFA (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs HEFA's -32.39%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 14.93% vs 12.70% for HEFA. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HEFA has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HEFA.

HEFA has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 1.10% for IVV.

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while HEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.35% for HEFA.

HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and HEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer