IVV vs. EEM
IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while EEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVV returned 15.47%/yr vs 9.91%/yr for EEM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVV charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for EEM.
Performance
IVV vs. EEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVV achieves a 9.08% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 24.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed EEM with an annualized return of 15.47%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
EEM
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 24.07%
- 6M
- 26.94%
- 1Y
- 47.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
IVV vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 24.07% | 33.98% | 6.49% | 8.95% | -20.56% | -3.63% | 17.02% | 18.22% | -15.31% | 37.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVV and EEM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2003 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IVV and EEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVV vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVV
EEM
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
IVV
EEM
Financial Services
IVV
EEM
Communication Services
IVV
EEM
Consumer Cyclical
IVV
EEM
Healthcare
IVV
EEM
Industrials
IVV
EEM
Consumer Defensive
IVV
EEM
Energy
IVV
EEM
Utilities
IVV
EEM
Real Estate
IVV
EEM
Basic Materials
IVV
EEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVV vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank
IVV
EEM
IVV vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.36 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.43 | 12.38 | +0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVV vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and EEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -66.43% | +11.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -13.52% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.75% | -17.29% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.53% | -37.49% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.90% | -39.82% | +5.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.35% | -4.12% | +1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -16.00% | +5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.67% | -1.70% |
Volatility
IVV vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is 4.37%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 10.80%. This indicates that IVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVV | EEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 10.80% | -6.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.59% | 19.39% | -9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 21.64% | -9.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 19.26% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 20.64% | -2.56% |
IVV vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVV vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison
IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than EEM's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 1.79% | 2.22% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.50% | 1.99% | 1.45% | 2.76% | 2.24% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 2.49% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVV and EEM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEM has higher volatility (10.80%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs EEM's -66.43%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.47% vs 9.91% for EEM. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.47% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.
EEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 1.08% for IVV.
IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.72% for EEM.
EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVV and EEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer