PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRA vs. PRVS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVRA vs. PRVS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IVRA having a 11.70% return and PRVS slightly lower at 11.32%.


IVRA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
11.70%
6M
12.41%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
7.62%
10Y*

PRVS

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.79%
YTD
11.32%
6M
12.60%
1Y
32.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRA vs. PRVS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
11.70%10.20%-3.51%
PRVS
Parnassus Value Select ETF
11.32%18.07%-4.37%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRA and PRVS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

0.46

The correlation between IVRA and PRVS shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVRA vs. PRVS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRA
IVRA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IVRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

PRVS
PRVS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PRVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PRVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRA vs. PRVS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVRAPRVSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

3.48

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.02

16.43

-4.40

IVRA vs. PRVS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the PRVS Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRA and PRVS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVRAPRVSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.51

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

1.01

-0.28

Drawdowns

IVRA vs. PRVS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRA drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than PRVS's maximum drawdown of -17.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRA and PRVS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRAPRVSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.99%

-17.64%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.60%

-9.32%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.45%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-2.68%

-4.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.97%

-0.65%

Volatility

IVRA vs. PRVS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) is 0.00%, while Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that IVRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRVS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVRAPRVSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

3.21%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.45%

10.09%

-4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.27%

12.92%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

16.81%

-0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

16.81%

-0.42%

IVRA vs. PRVS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IVRA and PRVS have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

IVRA vs. PRVS - Dividend Comparison

IVRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.99%, more than PRVS's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
16.99%5.68%3.71%2.47%2.30%3.01%
PRVS
Parnassus Value Select ETF
0.54%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVRA and PRVS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRVS has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRA dropped -25.99% vs PRVS's -17.64%.

On 1-year performance, PRVS leads with 32.25% vs 15.73% for IVRA. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PRVS has performed better with a 32.25% return vs 15.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVRA and PRVS have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 0.54% for PRVS.

IVRA is categorized as ESG, while PRVS is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Parnassus.

PRVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVRA and PRVS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer