IVRA vs. NUMV
IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and NUMV (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while NUMV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index. IVRA is actively managed, while NUMV is passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for NUMV.
Performance
IVRA vs. NUMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IVRA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUMV
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 13.76%
- 1Y
- 25.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- —
IVRA vs. NUMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 10.20% | 13.07% | 9.13% | -10.00% | 32.74% | 1.28% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 13.76% | 14.05% | 12.31% | 8.43% | -14.97% | 31.15% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRA and NUMV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVRA and NUMV has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IVRA vs. NUMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRA
NUMV
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
IVRA
NUMV
Energy
IVRA
NUMV
Basic Materials
IVRA
NUMV
Utilities
IVRA
NUMV
Consumer Cyclical
IVRA
NUMV
Consumer Defensive
IVRA
NUMV
Financial Services
IVRA
NUMV
Communication Services
IVRA
-
NUMV
Healthcare
IVRA
-
NUMV
Industrials
IVRA
-
NUMV
Technology
IVRA
-
NUMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRA vs. NUMV — Risk / Return Rank
IVRA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUMV
IVRA vs. NUMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRA | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRA vs. NUMV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRA | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -43.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -6.81% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.29% | — |
Volatility
IVRA vs. NUMV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRA | NUMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.52% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 17.32% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.69% | — |
IVRA vs. NUMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than NUMV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRA vs. NUMV - Dividend Comparison
IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.80% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUMV Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.35% | 1.53% | 1.81% | 2.20% | 5.78% | 6.62% | 1.38% | 2.40% | 4.01% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRA and NUMV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NUMV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NUMV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 1.35% for NUMV.
IVRA is categorized as ESG, while NUMV is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.31% for NUMV.
Find the right allocation for IVRA and NUMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer