IVRA vs. KLMN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and KLMN (Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while KLMN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index. IVRA is actively managed, while KLMN is passively managed. Over the past year, IVRA returned 14.88% vs 21.80% for KLMN. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for KLMN.

Performance

IVRA vs. KLMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRA achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than KLMN's 7.96% return.

IVRA

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 11.70%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 14.88%
• 3Y*: 15.44%
• 5Y*: 7.62%
• 10Y*: —

KLMN

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 6.60%
• 1Y: 21.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRA vs. KLMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	11.70%	10.20%	-3.65%
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF	7.96%	18.24%	-3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRA and KLMN is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between IVRA and KLMN has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IVRA vs. KLMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KLMN

KLMN Risk / Return Rank: 60
KLMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
KLMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
KLMN Omega Ratio Rank: 57
KLMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
KLMN Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRA vs. KLMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVRA	KLMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.73	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	2.40	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.31	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	2.44	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.38	10.66	+1.72

IVRA vs. KLMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the KLMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRA and KLMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVRA vs. KLMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRA drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than KLMN's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRA and KLMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRA	KLMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.99%	-19.16%	-6.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-8.96%	+4.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-3.29%	+2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.25%	-2.52%	-4.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	2.05%	-0.73%

Volatility

IVRA vs. KLMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) is 0.00%, while Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that IVRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVRA	KLMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	4.35%	-4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.37%	9.86%	-4.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.26%	12.67%	-3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.58%	17.58%	-1.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.37%	17.58%	-1.21%

IVRA vs. KLMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMN's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVRA vs. KLMN - Dividend Comparison

IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	16.80%	5.68%	3.71%	2.47%	2.30%	3.01%
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF	1.23%	1.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRA and KLMN in my portfolio?

IVRA and KLMN have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVRA or KLMN?

KLMN has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRA dropped -25.99% vs KLMN's -19.16%.

Which ETF is better, IVRA or KLMN?

On 1-year performance, KLMN leads with 21.80% vs 14.88% for IVRA. On fees, KLMN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVRA or KLMN?

Over the 1-year period, KLMN has performed better with a 21.80% return vs 14.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRA or KLMN?

KLMN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRA or KLMN?

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 1.23% for KLMN.

What is the main difference between IVRA and KLMN?

IVRA is categorized as ESG, while KLMN is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.09% for KLMN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.