IVRA vs. KLMN

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and KLMN (Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while KLMN is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI Global Climate 500 North America Selection Index. IVRA is actively managed, while KLMN is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for KLMN.

Performance

IVRA vs. KLMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IVRA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLMN

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 0.29%
• 6M: 9.10%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 1Y: 21.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRA vs. KLMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	11.70%	10.20%	-3.65%
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF	10.46%	18.24%	-3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRA and KLMN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between IVRA and KLMN has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IVRA vs. KLMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KLMN

KLMN Risk / Return Rank: 64
KLMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
KLMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
KLMN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
KLMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
KLMN Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRA vs. KLMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVRA	KLMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.69	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.39	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.23	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRA	KLMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-19.16%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.05%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.48%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IVRA	KLMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	12.68%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.33%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	17.33%	—

IVRA vs. KLMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMN's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVRA vs. KLMN - Dividend Comparison

IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF	16.80%	5.68%	3.71%	2.47%	2.30%	3.01%
KLMN Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF	1.20%	1.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRA and KLMN in my portfolio?

IVRA and KLMN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IVRA or KLMN?

On fees, KLMN is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRA or KLMN?

KLMN is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRA or KLMN?

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 1.20% for KLMN.

What is the main difference between IVRA and KLMN?

IVRA is categorized as ESG, while KLMN is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.09% for KLMN.