IVRA vs. IQSZ
IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and IQSZ (Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF) are both ESG funds from Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IQSZ.
Performance
IVRA vs. IQSZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IVRA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQSZ
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- YTD
- 13.58%
- 1Y
- 28.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVRA vs. IQSZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 3.80% |
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 13.58% | 13.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRA and IQSZ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRA vs. IQSZ — Risk / Return Rank
IVRA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IQSZ
IVRA vs. IQSZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF (IQSZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRA | IQSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRA vs. IQSZ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRA | IQSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.16% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.24% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.15% | — |
Volatility
IVRA vs. IQSZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRA | IQSZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.07% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 14.07% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 14.07% | — |
IVRA vs. IQSZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IQSZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRA vs. IQSZ - Dividend Comparison
IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQSZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSZ Invesco Global Equity Net Zero ETF | 1.77% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.80% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRA and IQSZ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IQSZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 1.77% for IQSZ.
Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.19% for IQSZ.
Find the right allocation for IVRA and IQSZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer