IVRA vs. EMCS
IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) and EMCS (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco, while EMCS is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Select Index. IVRA is actively managed, while EMCS is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVRA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for EMCS.
Performance
IVRA vs. EMCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IVRA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMCS
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- YTD
- 23.30%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- —
IVRA vs. EMCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 10.20% | 13.07% | 9.13% | -10.00% | 32.74% | 1.28% |
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 23.30% | 38.71% | 10.12% | 5.68% | -23.58% | -2.02% | 0.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRA and EMCS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2020 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVRA and EMCS has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IVRA vs. EMCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRA
EMCS
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
IVRA
EMCS
Energy
IVRA
EMCS
Basic Materials
IVRA
EMCS
Utilities
IVRA
EMCS
Consumer Cyclical
IVRA
EMCS
Consumer Defensive
IVRA
EMCS
Financial Services
IVRA
EMCS
Communication Services
IVRA
-
EMCS
Healthcare
IVRA
-
EMCS
Industrials
IVRA
-
EMCS
Technology
IVRA
-
EMCS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRA vs. EMCS — Risk / Return Rank
IVRA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMCS
IVRA vs. EMCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF (EMCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRA | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRA vs. EMCS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRA | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -44.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -10.93% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -16.44% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.30% | — |
Volatility
IVRA vs. EMCS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRA | EMCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 26.41% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.56% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.14% | — |
IVRA vs. EMCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRA vs. EMCS - Dividend Comparison
IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCS Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Selection ETF | 1.54% | 1.66% | 0.67% | 3.07% | 2.26% | 1.46% | 1.40% | 3.56% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.80% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRA and EMCS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMCS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMCS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 1.54% for EMCS.
IVRA is categorized as ESG, while EMCS is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IVRA and 0.15% for EMCS.
Find the right allocation for IVRA and EMCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer