IVOL vs. KLIP
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while KLIP is a Options Trading fund managed by CICC. Over the past 3 years, IVOL returned -3.54%/yr vs 8.39%/yr for KLIP. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KLIP.
Performance
IVOL vs. KLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly higher than KLIP's -7.94% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- -5.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
KLIP
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- -7.94%
- 6M
- -9.28%
- 1Y
- 1.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. KLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -6.33% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.30% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -7.94% | 16.92% | 3.37% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and KLIP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2023 | -0.03 |
IVOL vs. KLIP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOL
KLIP
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IVOL
KLIP
Basic Materials
IVOL
-
KLIP
-
Communication Services
IVOL
-
KLIP
Consumer Cyclical
IVOL
-
KLIP
Consumer Defensive
IVOL
-
KLIP
Energy
IVOL
-
KLIP
-
Healthcare
IVOL
-
KLIP
Industrials
IVOL
-
KLIP
-
Real Estate
IVOL
-
KLIP
Technology
IVOL
-
KLIP
Utilities
IVOL
-
KLIP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. KLIP — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
KLIP
IVOL vs. KLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOL | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.03 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.07 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 0.17 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOL | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 0.07 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.35 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. KLIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, which is greater than KLIP's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and KLIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -18.61% | -12.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -15.97% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.63% | -18.61% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.33% | -13.22% | -13.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -3.79% | -9.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 6.70% | -2.32% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. KLIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 1.07%, while KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | KLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 5.71% | -4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.44% | 12.86% | -8.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 15.84% | -8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 18.13% | -5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 18.13% | -6.14% |
IVOL vs. KLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KLIP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. KLIP - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than KLIP's 28.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.89% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 28.17% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and KLIP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLIP has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to IVOL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs KLIP's -18.61%.
On 3-year performance, KLIP leads with 8.39% vs -3.54% for IVOL. On fees, KLIP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, KLIP has performed better with a 8.39% return vs -3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KLIP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 28.17%, compared with 3.89% for IVOL.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while KLIP is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.95% for KLIP.
KLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and KLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer