IVOL vs. KEMX
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while KEMX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. IVOL is actively managed, while KEMX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IVOL returned -5.77%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.
Performance
IVOL vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -6.33% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.62%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -7.21%
- 1Y
- -5.59%
- 3Y*
- -3.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 42.26%
- 6M
- 47.92%
- 1Y
- 79.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -6.33% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.18% | -12.69% | -0.31% | 14.56% | 3.23% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 42.26% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 14.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and KEMX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019 | 0.05 |
IVOL vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOL
KEMX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IVOL
KEMX
Basic Materials
IVOL
-
KEMX
Communication Services
IVOL
-
KEMX
Consumer Cyclical
IVOL
-
KEMX
Consumer Defensive
IVOL
-
KEMX
Energy
IVOL
-
KEMX
Healthcare
IVOL
-
KEMX
Industrials
IVOL
-
KEMX
Real Estate
IVOL
-
KEMX
Technology
IVOL
-
KEMX
Utilities
IVOL
-
KEMX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
KEMX
IVOL vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOL | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.62 | -0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 5.24 | -5.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | 20.86 | -22.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOL | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 | 3.59 | -4.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | 0.75 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.68 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and KEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -38.80% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -15.36% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.63% | -19.62% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | -30.85% | +0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.33% | -1.31% | -25.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -8.86% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 3.85% | +0.53% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 1.07%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 9.86% | -8.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.44% | 19.90% | -15.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.89% | 22.40% | -15.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 18.21% | -5.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 20.94% | -8.95% |
IVOL vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.89% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.31% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and KEMX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to IVOL (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs KEMX's -38.80%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs -5.77% for IVOL. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs -5.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while KEMX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.25% for KEMX.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and KEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer