IVOL vs. CTEX
IVOL (Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) and CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund actively managed by CICC, while CTEX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index. IVOL is actively managed, while CTEX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVOL returned -3.70%/yr vs 16.57%/yr for CTEX. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. IVOL charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for CTEX.
Performance
IVOL vs. CTEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOL achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly lower than CTEX's 39.08% return.
IVOL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 6M
- -6.48%
- 1Y
- -5.75%
- 3Y*
- -3.70%
- 5Y*
- -5.75%
- 10Y*
- —
CTEX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 17.61%
- YTD
- 39.08%
- 6M
- 35.87%
- 1Y
- 153.28%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOL vs. CTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -6.22% | 11.97% | -11.07% | -5.18% | -12.69% | -2.62% |
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 39.08% | 67.74% | -20.38% | -10.25% | -20.38% | -6.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOL and CTEX is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | -0.03 |
The correlation between IVOL and CTEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVOL vs. CTEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOL
CTEX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IVOL
CTEX
-
Basic Materials
IVOL
-
CTEX
-
Communication Services
IVOL
-
CTEX
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVOL
-
CTEX
Consumer Defensive
IVOL
-
CTEX
-
Energy
IVOL
-
CTEX
Healthcare
IVOL
-
CTEX
-
Industrials
IVOL
-
CTEX
Real Estate
IVOL
-
CTEX
-
Technology
IVOL
-
CTEX
Utilities
IVOL
-
CTEX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOL vs. CTEX — Risk / Return Rank
IVOL
CTEX
IVOL vs. CTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) and ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOL | CTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.48 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 7.13 | -7.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 19.80 | -21.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOL | CTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.84 | 3.66 | -4.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.11 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
IVOL vs. CTEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOL drawdown since its inception was -31.16%, smaller than the maximum CTEX drawdown of -70.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOL and CTEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOL | CTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.16% | -70.31% | +39.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.81% | -21.62% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | -56.83% | +40.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.25% | -4.69% | -21.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -41.90% | +28.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 7.77% | -3.35% |
Volatility
IVOL vs. CTEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IVOL) is 1.10%, while ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that IVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOL | CTEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 15.38% | -14.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.44% | 29.90% | -25.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.90% | 42.16% | -35.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.84% | 43.28% | -30.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 43.28% | -31.29% |
IVOL vs. CTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEX's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOL vs. CTEX - Dividend Comparison
IVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than CTEX's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF | 1.50% | 2.17% | 0.57% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOL Quadratic Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 3.89% | 3.61% | 3.83% | 3.73% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOL and CTEX have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTEX has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to IVOL (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOL dropped -31.16% vs CTEX's -70.31%.
On 3-year performance, CTEX leads with 16.57% vs -3.70% for IVOL. On fees, CTEX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, IVOL has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CTEX has performed better with a 16.57% return vs -3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CTEX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IVOL.
IVOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.50% for CTEX.
IVOL is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while CTEX is Alternative Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: CICC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for IVOL and 0.58% for CTEX.
CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOL and CTEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer