IVOG vs. WNTR
IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IVOG is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, IVOG returned 22.81% vs 107.38% for WNTR. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IVOG charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
IVOG vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOG achieves a 15.87% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.75% return.
IVOG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 15.87%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.22%
WNTR
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 1Y
- 107.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 47.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.19M | $2.83M | $3.26M | |
| $4.02M | $3.86M | $3.95M |
IVOG vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 15.87% | 13.67% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.75% | 52.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOG and WNTR is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOG vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
IVOG
WNTR
IVOG vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOG | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.32 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 2.71 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.98 | 6.87 | +1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOG vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOG | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.32% | -42.65% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -42.65% | +32.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -9.64% | +4.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -20.18% | +14.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 16.81% | -14.14% |
Volatility
IVOG vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) is 4.23%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that IVOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOG | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 14.85% | -10.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.00% | 47.43% | -33.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.93% | 54.68% | -36.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 53.42% | -32.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.61% | 53.42% | -32.81% |
IVOG vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOG vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than WNTR's 107.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% | 0.79% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 0.47% | 0.74% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 1.04% |
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.02% | 58.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOG and WNTR have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WNTR has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to IVOG (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs WNTR's -42.65%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 107.38% vs 22.81% for IVOG. On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 107.38% return vs 22.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 107.02%, compared with 0.56% for IVOG.
IVOG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOG and 1.00% for WNTR.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOG and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer