IVOG vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IVOG is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, IVOG returned 24.60% vs 116.49% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. IVOG charges 0.10%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

IVOG vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOG achieves a 18.20% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 8.06% return.

IVOG

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.61%
• 6M: 12.82%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 1Y: 24.60%
• 3Y*: 15.41%
• 5Y*: 7.98%
• 10Y*: 11.17%

WNTR

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 15.85%
• 6M: 10.45%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 1Y: 116.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOG vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	18.20%	13.67%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	8.06%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOG and WNTR is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.40

Return for Risk

IVOG vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOG

IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 53
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 65
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOG vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVOG	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.06	-0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	2.34	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	2.60	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	6.69	+2.63

IVOG vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOG and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVOG vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVOG	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.32%	-42.65%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.69%	-42.65%	+32.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-11.84%	+8.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.85%	-20.57%	+14.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	16.58%	-14.06%

Volatility

IVOG vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) is 5.76%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.80%. This indicates that IVOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVOG	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	18.80%	-13.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.88%	47.57%	-33.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.86%	53.81%	-35.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.72%	53.62%	-32.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.58%	53.62%	-33.04%

IVOG vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVOG vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than WNTR's 104.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF	0.55%	0.64%	0.79%	1.15%	1.05%	0.47%	0.74%	1.17%	1.01%	0.93%	1.11%	1.04%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	104.11%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVOG and WNTR in my portfolio?

IVOG and WNTR have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVOG or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.80%) compared to IVOG (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, IVOG or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 116.49% vs 24.60% for IVOG. On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOG has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVOG or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 116.49% return vs 24.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVOG or WNTR?

IVOG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVOG or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 104.11%, compared with 0.55% for IVOG.

What is the main difference between IVOG and WNTR?

IVOG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOG and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.