PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVLU vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVLU vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.09% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.09%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.04% annualized return.


IVLU

1D
0.45%
1M
0.05%
YTD
10.99%
6M
14.55%
1Y
32.63%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
13.74%
10Y*
11.09%

XLK

1D
2.15%
1M
4.93%
YTD
28.09%
6M
25.10%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
25.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVLU vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVLU
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
10.99%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.09%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and XLK is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2015

0.53

The correlation between IVLU and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVLU vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVLU
XLK

Financial Services

25.3%

-

Industrials

17.2%
0.1%

Technology

11.3%
99.7%

Healthcare

9.7%

-

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Energy

5.1%
0.2%

Communication Services

4.0%

-

Utilities

3.3%

-

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Financial Services

IVLU
25.3%
XLK

-

Industrials

IVLU
17.2%
XLK
0.1%

Technology

IVLU
11.3%
XLK
99.7%

Healthcare

IVLU
9.7%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

IVLU
7.5%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

IVLU
7.4%
XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

IVLU
6.3%
XLK

-

Energy

IVLU
5.1%
XLK
0.2%

Communication Services

IVLU
4.0%
XLK

-

Utilities

IVLU
3.3%
XLK

-

Real Estate

IVLU
1.5%
XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVLU vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVLU vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVLUXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.50

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.66

11.58

-0.93

IVLU vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVLUXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

2.53

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.89

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

1.02

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.41

+0.06

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVLUXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-82.05%

+40.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-15.92%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-25.66%

+10.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-33.56%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-33.56%

-8.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-7.08%

+4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-34.95%

+26.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.80%

-1.73%

Volatility

IVLU vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) is 4.47%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that IVLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVLUXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

10.42%

-5.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

18.32%

-5.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

22.08%

-6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

25.10%

-8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

24.60%

-6.93%

IVLU vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVLU vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVLU
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
3.34%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVLU and XLK have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to IVLU (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.04% vs 11.09% for IVLU. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IVLU has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.04% return vs 11.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.

IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVLU and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer