PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVLU vs. IWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVLU vs. IWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly higher than IWP's 0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has underperformed IWP with an annualized return of 11.00%, while IWP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.


IVLU

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.90%
6M
7.68%
YTD
11.76%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
8.40%

IWP

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.07%
6M
-2.52%
YTD
0.63%
1Y
-1.82%
3Y*
12.07%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
11.64%
ALL TIME*
9.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVLU vs. IWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
11.76%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.63%8.45%21.86%25.70%-26.90%12.60%35.25%35.04%-4.89%24.93%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and IWP is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.59

The correlation between IVLU and IWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVLU vs. IWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVLU
IWP

Financial Services

29.1%
3.9%

Industrials

17.4%
20.7%

Technology

9.9%
33.5%

Healthcare

9.7%
13.2%

Basic Materials

7.1%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
1.2%

Energy

5.3%
4.3%

Utilities

3.6%
2.7%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.4%
2.2%

Financial Services

IVLU
29.1%
IWP
3.9%

Industrials

IVLU
17.4%
IWP
20.7%

Technology

IVLU
9.9%
IWP
33.5%

Healthcare

IVLU
9.7%
IWP
13.2%

Basic Materials

IVLU
7.1%
IWP
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IVLU
6.7%
IWP
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

IVLU
5.9%
IWP
1.2%

Energy

IVLU
5.3%
IWP
4.3%

Utilities

IVLU
3.6%
IWP
2.7%

Communication Services

IVLU
3.5%
IWP
3.3%

Real Estate

IVLU
1.4%
IWP
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVLU vs. IWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IWP
IWP Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
IWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
IWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWP Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVLU vs. IWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVLUIWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.00

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

-0.12

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.70

-0.35

+11.05

IVLU vs. IWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the IWP Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and IWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. IWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum IWP drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and IWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVLUIWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-56.92%

+15.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-14.79%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-25.20%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-38.62%

+12.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-38.62%

-3.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-6.02%

+3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-9.65%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

5.19%

-2.10%

Volatility

IVLU vs. IWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) is 3.99%, while iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that IVLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVLUIWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

5.06%

-1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

13.78%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

17.32%

-1.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

22.44%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

21.69%

-4.32%

IVLU vs. IWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IWP's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVLU vs. IWP - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than IWP's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
3.36%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%
IWP
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.37%0.40%0.54%0.77%0.30%0.38%0.59%1.02%0.78%1.16%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVLU and IWP have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWP has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to IVLU (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs IWP's -56.92%.

On 10-year performance, IWP leads with 11.64% vs 11.00% for IVLU. On fees, IWP is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, IVLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWP has performed better with a 11.64% return vs 11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWP is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.36% for IWP.

IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWP is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while IWP tracks Russell Midcap Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.23% for IWP.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVLU and IWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer