PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVLU vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVLU vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 15.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 11.00%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.77% annualized return.


IVLU

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.90%
6M
7.68%
YTD
11.76%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
15.04%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
8.40%

IEMG

1D
0.30%
1M
-9.83%
6M
9.74%
YTD
15.78%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
8.77%
ALL TIME*
6.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVLU vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
11.76%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
15.78%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and IEMG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015

0.69

The correlation between IVLU and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVLU vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVLU
IEMG

Financial Services

29.1%
17.3%

Industrials

17.4%
7.7%

Technology

9.9%
43.6%

Healthcare

9.7%
3.2%

Basic Materials

7.1%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
2.8%

Energy

5.3%
3.0%

Utilities

3.6%
1.9%

Communication Services

3.5%
5.6%

Real Estate

1.4%
1.5%

Financial Services

IVLU
29.1%
IEMG
17.3%

Industrials

IVLU
17.4%
IEMG
7.7%

Technology

IVLU
9.9%
IEMG
43.6%

Healthcare

IVLU
9.7%
IEMG
3.2%

Basic Materials

IVLU
7.1%
IEMG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVLU
6.7%
IEMG
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

IVLU
5.9%
IEMG
2.8%

Energy

IVLU
5.3%
IEMG
3.0%

Utilities

IVLU
3.6%
IEMG
1.9%

Communication Services

IVLU
3.5%
IEMG
5.6%

Real Estate

IVLU
1.4%
IEMG
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVLU vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVLU vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVLUIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

2.26

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.70

7.35

+3.35

IVLU vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVLUIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-38.71%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-13.21%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-17.21%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-33.61%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-38.71%

-3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.38%

-10.22%

+7.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-12.90%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

4.05%

-0.96%

Volatility

IVLU vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) is 3.99%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that IVLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVLUIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

9.61%

-5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

21.09%

-7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

23.06%

-7.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

19.17%

-2.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.37%

20.24%

-2.87%

IVLU vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVLU vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than IEMG's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.33%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
IVLU
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF
3.36%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVLU and IEMG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (9.61%) compared to IVLU (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.00% vs 8.77% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IVLU has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.00% return vs 8.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 2.33% for IEMG.

IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.09% for IEMG.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVLU and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer