PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVLU vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVLU vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IVLU having a 12.64% return and ACWI slightly lower at 12.13%. Over the past 10 years, IVLU has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 10.97%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


IVLU

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.72%
YTD
12.64%
6M
16.60%
1Y
35.35%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
10.97%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVLU vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVLU
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
12.64%46.09%6.76%20.07%-5.73%15.60%-4.50%15.60%-15.10%23.10%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IVLU and ACWI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2015

0.78

The correlation between IVLU and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVLU vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVLU
ACWI

Financial Services

25.3%
16.1%

Industrials

17.2%
10.9%

Technology

11.3%
29.4%

Healthcare

9.7%
8.1%

Basic Materials

7.5%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
5.0%

Energy

5.1%
4.2%

Communication Services

4.0%
9.0%

Utilities

3.3%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Financial Services

IVLU
25.3%
ACWI
16.1%

Industrials

IVLU
17.2%
ACWI
10.9%

Technology

IVLU
11.3%
ACWI
29.4%

Healthcare

IVLU
9.7%
ACWI
8.1%

Basic Materials

IVLU
7.5%
ACWI
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IVLU
7.4%
ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

IVLU
6.3%
ACWI
5.0%

Energy

IVLU
5.1%
ACWI
4.2%

Communication Services

IVLU
4.0%
ACWI
9.0%

Utilities

IVLU
3.3%
ACWI
2.6%

Real Estate

IVLU
1.5%
ACWI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVLU vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVLU
IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVLU vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVLUACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.41

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.01

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

13.53

-1.95

IVLU vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVLU Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVLU and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVLUACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.29

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.71

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.75

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.43

+0.05

Drawdowns

IVLU vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVLUACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.85%

-56.00%

+14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.69%

-9.73%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-16.55%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-26.42%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

-33.53%

-8.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-0.83%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-8.61%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.16%

+0.90%

Volatility

IVLU vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 4.63% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVLUACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

3.93%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

10.29%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.09%

12.78%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.48%

16.05%

+0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

17.11%

+0.55%

IVLU vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVLU vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
IVLU
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
3.29%3.71%4.46%4.69%3.59%3.47%2.05%3.53%2.82%2.87%2.53%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVLU and ACWI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVLU has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 10.97% for IVLU. On fees, IVLU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 10.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVLU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.32% for ACWI.

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVLU and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer