IVGTX vs. SGSCX
IVGTX (VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio) and SGSCX (DWS Global Small Cap Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, IVGTX returned 7.47%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for SGSCX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVGTX charges 1.20%/yr vs 1.12%/yr for SGSCX.
Performance
IVGTX vs. SGSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVGTX achieves a -13.06% return, which is significantly lower than SGSCX's 21.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IVGTX has underperformed SGSCX with an annualized return of 7.47%, while SGSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
IVGTX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -13.76%
- 1Y
- -17.42%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
SGSCX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 21.06%
- 6M
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 38.30%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
IVGTX vs. SGSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVGTX VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio | -13.06% | 0.16% | 8.63% | 16.01% | -17.63% | 21.67% | 13.17% | 29.34% | -2.81% | 25.90% |
SGSCX DWS Global Small Cap Fund | 21.06% | 20.22% | 5.35% | 24.62% | -24.63% | 15.10% | 16.98% | 22.29% | -21.96% | 19.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVGTX and SGSCX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2002 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IVGTX and SGSCX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVGTX vs. SGSCX — Risk / Return Rank
IVGTX
SGSCX
IVGTX vs. SGSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) and DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVGTX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.43 | -0.67 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 4.25 | -5.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.73 | 15.86 | -17.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVGTX vs. SGSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVGTX drawdown since its inception was -44.75%, smaller than the maximum SGSCX drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVGTX and SGSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVGTX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.75% | -62.26% | +17.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.45% | -9.54% | -10.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.45% | -22.37% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.27% | -33.72% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.16% | -45.98% | +15.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.19% | -0.62% | -18.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -14.09% | +8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.44% | 2.55% | +7.89% |
Volatility
IVGTX vs. SGSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio (IVGTX) is 4.34%, while DWS Global Small Cap Fund (SGSCX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that IVGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVGTX | SGSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 5.87% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 12.48% | -2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 16.02% | -3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 18.98% | -2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.40% | 19.44% | -3.04% |
IVGTX vs. SGSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVGTX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SGSCX's 1.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVGTX vs. SGSCX - Dividend Comparison
IVGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.23%, more than SGSCX's 8.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVGTX VY Morgan Stanley Global Franchise Portfolio | 49.23% | 42.80% | 10.28% | 8.24% | 10.69% | 8.69% | 8.32% | 11.20% | 17.80% | 7.06% | 10.12% | 14.63% |
SGSCX DWS Global Small Cap Fund | 8.56% | 10.37% | 6.35% | 5.12% | 5.42% | 16.72% | 0.36% | 0.29% | 18.31% | 11.13% | 7.52% | 6.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVGTX and SGSCX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGSCX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to IVGTX (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVGTX dropped -44.75% vs SGSCX's -62.26%.
SGSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVGTX and SGSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer