IVES vs. XLK
IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IVES tracks the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVES charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
IVES vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVES achieves a 27.14% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return.
IVES
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- 18.28%
- YTD
- 27.14%
- 6M
- 24.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
IVES vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 27.14% | 25.06% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 22.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVES and XLK is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.90 |
IVES vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVES
XLK
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
IVES
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
IVES
XLK
-
Communication Services
IVES
XLK
-
Industrials
IVES
XLK
Financial Services
IVES
XLK
-
Utilities
IVES
XLK
-
Basic Materials
IVES
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
IVES
-
XLK
-
Energy
IVES
-
XLK
Healthcare
IVES
-
XLK
-
Real Estate
IVES
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVES vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
IVES
XLK
IVES vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVES | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.32 | 0.42 | +1.90 |
Drawdowns
IVES vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVES drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVES and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVES | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.64% | -82.05% | +59.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -1.00% | -2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -34.96% | +29.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.74% | — |
Volatility
IVES vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVES | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 20.82% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 24.90% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 24.49% | +1.28% |
IVES vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVES has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVES vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
IVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than XLK's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF | 0.33% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, IVES and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.33% for IVES.
IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVES and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for IVES and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer