IVES vs. NXTG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IVES (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF) and NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IVES tracks the Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index while NXTG tracks the Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVES charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NXTG.

Performance

IVES vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVES achieves a 27.14% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG's 54.54% return.

IVES

• 1D: -2.92%
• 1M: 18.28%
• YTD: 27.14%
• 6M: 24.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NXTG

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 22.84%
• YTD: 54.54%
• 6M: 55.39%
• 1Y: 82.82%
• 3Y*: 35.56%
• 5Y*: 19.17%
• 10Y*: 17.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVES vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF	27.14%	25.06%
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF	54.54%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IVES and NXTG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.74

IVES vs. NXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVES	NXTG
Technology	67.8%	66.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.9%	0.4%
Communication Services	11.8%	21.7%
Industrials	4.3%	4.3%
Financial Services	1.7%	-
Utilities	1.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	7.5%

Return for Risk

IVES vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTG

NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 96
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 96
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVES vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IVES	NXTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.32	0.69	+1.63

Drawdowns

IVES vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVES drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVES and NXTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVES	NXTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.64%	-33.61%	+10.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.69%	-0.82%	-2.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-7.87%	+2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.62%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IVES	NXTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.77%	18.44%	+7.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.77%	17.93%	+7.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.77%	18.88%	+6.89%

IVES vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVES has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVES vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison

IVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than NXTG's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVES Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF	0.33%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF	1.11%	1.56%	1.51%	2.15%	2.04%	1.97%	1.04%	0.77%	1.27%	1.65%	1.23%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVES and NXTG in my portfolio?

IVES and NXTG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IVES or NXTG?

On fees, NXTG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVES or NXTG?

NXTG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVES or NXTG?

NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.33% for IVES.

What is the main difference between IVES and NXTG?

IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index, while NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVES and 0.70% for NXTG.