PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVES vs. AIBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVES vs. AIBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVES achieves a 27.14% return, which is significantly lower than AIBU's 48.05% return.


IVES

1D
-2.92%
1M
18.28%
YTD
27.14%
6M
24.59%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIBU

1D
-4.35%
1M
29.93%
YTD
48.05%
6M
34.98%
1Y
109.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVES vs. AIBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IVES and AIBU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.92

IVES vs. AIBU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVES
AIBU

Technology

67.8%
26.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.9%
2.3%

Communication Services

11.8%
3.6%

Industrials

4.3%
0.1%

Financial Services

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

IVES
67.8%
AIBU
26.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IVES
12.9%
AIBU
2.3%

Communication Services

IVES
11.8%
AIBU
3.6%

Industrials

IVES
4.3%
AIBU
0.1%

Financial Services

IVES
1.7%
AIBU

-

Utilities

IVES
1.7%
AIBU

-

Basic Materials

IVES

-

AIBU

-

Consumer Defensive

IVES

-

AIBU

-

Energy

IVES

-

AIBU

-

Healthcare

IVES

-

AIBU
0.2%

Real Estate

IVES

-

AIBU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVES vs. AIBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVES

AIBU
AIBU Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AIBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIBU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AIBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIBU Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVES vs. AIBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES) and Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares (AIBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IVES vs. AIBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVESAIBUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.32

1.25

+1.07

Drawdowns

IVES vs. AIBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVES drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, smaller than the maximum AIBU drawdown of -51.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVES and AIBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVESAIBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.64%

-51.17%

+28.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-4.35%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-13.76%

+8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.91%

Volatility

IVES vs. AIBU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVESAIBUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.77%

47.71%

-21.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.77%

55.37%

-29.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.77%

55.37%

-29.60%

IVES vs. AIBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVES has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AIBU's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVES vs. AIBU - Dividend Comparison

IVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than AIBU's 1.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AIBU
Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X Shares
1.51%2.27%1.33%
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
0.33%0.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, IVES and AIBU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, IVES is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVES is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for AIBU.

AIBU has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.33% for IVES.

IVES is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIBU is Leveraged Equities. IVES tracks Solactive Wedbush Artificial Intelligence Index, while AIBU tracks Solactive US AI & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVES and 0.96% for AIBU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVES and AIBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer