PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVEP vs. FTDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVEP vs. FTDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IVEP

1D
-0.87%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTDS

1D
-0.21%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.72%
1Y
18.40%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
10.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVEP vs. FTDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IVEP and FTDS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVEP vs. FTDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVEP

FTDS
FTDS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FTDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTDS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FTDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTDS Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVEP vs. FTDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IVEP vs. FTDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVEPFTDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.62

0.32

+2.31

Drawdowns

IVEP vs. FTDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVEP drawdown since its inception was -7.34%, smaller than the maximum FTDS drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVEP and FTDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVEPFTDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-56.53%

+49.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-4.46%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-9.87%

+7.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

Volatility

IVEP vs. FTDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVEPFTDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.29%

12.92%

+13.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.29%

17.65%

+8.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.29%

20.14%

+6.15%

IVEP vs. FTDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVEP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTDS's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVEP vs. FTDS - Dividend Comparison

IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
1.66%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%
IVEP
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVEP and FTDS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTDS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTDS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.

FTDS has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.

IVEP is categorized as Industrials Equities, while FTDS is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IVEP tracks Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index, while FTDS tracks Dividend Strength Index. They also come from different issuers: Wedbush and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IVEP and 0.70% for FTDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVEP and FTDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer