PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVE vs. SEIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVE vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVE achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 18.28% return.


IVE

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.24%
YTD
7.46%
6M
7.74%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
11.76%

SEIV

1D
-0.85%
1M
10.69%
YTD
18.28%
6M
21.23%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVE vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
7.46%13.02%12.03%22.07%2.52%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
18.28%27.43%19.73%21.90%-3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between IVE and SEIV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.89

The correlation between IVE and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVE vs. SEIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVE
SEIV

Technology

19.6%
17.0%

Financial Services

15.2%
23.0%

Healthcare

11.6%
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
18.5%

Industrials

10.7%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
3.9%

Energy

7.6%
0.9%

Utilities

4.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

3.5%
1.2%

Basic Materials

3.4%
5.1%

Communication Services

3.3%
6.5%

Technology

IVE
19.6%
SEIV
17.0%

Financial Services

IVE
15.2%
SEIV
23.0%

Healthcare

IVE
11.6%
SEIV
18.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IVE
11.0%
SEIV
18.5%

Industrials

IVE
10.7%
SEIV
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

IVE
9.5%
SEIV
3.9%

Energy

IVE
7.6%
SEIV
0.9%

Utilities

IVE
4.6%
SEIV
2.4%

Real Estate

IVE
3.5%
SEIV
1.2%

Basic Materials

IVE
3.4%
SEIV
5.1%

Communication Services

IVE
3.3%
SEIV
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVE vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVE
IVE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIV
SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVE vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVESEIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.64

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

6.47

-3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

26.41

-13.32

IVE vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is lower than the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVE and SEIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVESEIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

3.60

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.23

-0.84

Drawdowns

IVE vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVE drawdown since its inception was -61.32%, which is greater than SEIV's maximum drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVE and SEIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVESEIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.32%

-18.18%

-43.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-6.95%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.58%

-17.71%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.85%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-3.48%

-6.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.70%

-0.08%

Volatility

IVE vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) is 2.00%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that IVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVESEIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

4.10%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

9.08%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

12.49%

-2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

16.68%

-2.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

16.68%

+0.28%

IVE vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVE vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

IVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than SEIV's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
1.52%1.61%2.04%1.65%2.10%1.81%2.37%2.11%2.74%2.12%2.26%2.44%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
1.34%1.51%1.66%2.08%1.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVE and SEIV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to IVE (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVE dropped -61.32% vs SEIV's -18.18%.

On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 27.80% vs 15.57% for IVE. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IVE has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 27.80% return vs 15.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IVE.

IVE has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 1.34% for SEIV.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IVE and 0.15% for SEIV.

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVE and SEIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer