PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVCSX vs. CSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVCSX vs. CSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Small Company Portfolio (IVCSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVCSX achieves a 16.73% return, which is significantly higher than CSMDX's 12.52% return.


IVCSX

1D
0.75%
1M
6.22%
YTD
16.73%
6M
15.00%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
16.93%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
9.70%

CSMDX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.48%
YTD
12.52%
6M
10.49%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
8.82%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVCSX vs. CSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVCSX
Voya Small Company Portfolio
16.73%8.94%10.56%18.00%-16.42%14.74%12.14%25.57%-15.83%7.06%
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
12.52%2.72%2.24%18.89%-14.89%22.60%8.29%29.90%-5.20%10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IVCSX and CSMDX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2017

0.90

The correlation between IVCSX and CSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVCSX vs. CSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVCSX
IVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CSMDX
CSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVCSX vs. CSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Small Company Portfolio (IVCSX) and Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVCSXCSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

1.90

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

5.82

+4.38

IVCSX vs. CSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the CSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVCSX and CSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVCSX vs. CSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVCSX drawdown since its inception was -54.59%, which is greater than CSMDX's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVCSX and CSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVCSXCSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.59%

-37.28%

-17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.52%

-9.20%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.45%

-24.60%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.47%

-24.60%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.23%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.35%

-5.74%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

3.00%

+0.45%

Volatility

IVCSX vs. CSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Small Company Portfolio (IVCSX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund (CSMDX) at 4.09%. This indicates that IVCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVCSXCSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

4.09%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.66%

10.59%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

14.69%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.60%

18.18%

+4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.22%

19.15%

+4.07%

IVCSX vs. CSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVCSX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CSMDX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVCSX vs. CSMDX - Dividend Comparison

IVCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than CSMDX's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSMDX
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund
2.79%3.14%1.33%0.81%4.07%6.67%0.38%2.61%4.40%0.13%0.00%0.00%
IVCSX
Voya Small Company Portfolio
6.34%15.99%3.68%0.41%37.13%0.52%1.91%15.01%21.50%11.07%9.01%17.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVCSX and CSMDX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVCSX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to CSMDX (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVCSX dropped -54.59% vs CSMDX's -37.28%.

IVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVCSX and CSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer