IVAL vs. BOXA
IVAL (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF) and BOXA (Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVAL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while BOXA is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IVAL returned 32.20% vs 3.52% for BOXA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IVAL charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BOXA.
Performance
IVAL vs. BOXA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVAL achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than BOXA's -0.19% return.
IVAL
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 32.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
BOXA
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVAL vs. BOXA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 13.29% | 34.92% | 2.62% |
BOXA Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.19% | 5.41% | 0.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVAL and BOXA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVAL vs. BOXA — Risk / Return Rank
IVAL
BOXA
IVAL vs. BOXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVAL | BOXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.16 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 1.10 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 3.36 | +6.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVAL | BOXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 0.94 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.87 | -0.53 |
Drawdowns
IVAL vs. BOXA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than BOXA's maximum drawdown of -3.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and BOXA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVAL | BOXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.09% | -3.22% | -42.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.24% | -3.22% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -2.04% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.00% | -0.75% | -11.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 1.05% | +2.13% |
Volatility
IVAL vs. BOXA - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF (BOXA) at 1.36%. This indicates that IVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVAL | BOXA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.82% | 1.36% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 2.62% | +9.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.37% | 3.75% | +11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.74% | 4.15% | +13.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 4.15% | +14.69% |
IVAL vs. BOXA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BOXA's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVAL vs. BOXA - Dividend Comparison
IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than BOXA's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOXA Alpha Architect Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVAL Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF | 2.66% | 2.75% | 3.60% | 5.15% | 8.00% | 3.95% | 2.07% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 1.73% | 2.02% | 1.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVAL and BOXA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVAL has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to BOXA (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs BOXA's -3.22%.
On 1-year performance, IVAL leads with 32.20% vs 3.52% for BOXA. On fees, BOXA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BOXA has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IVAL has performed better with a 32.20% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BOXA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IVAL.
IVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.66%, compared with 0.13% for BOXA.
IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BOXA is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.23% for BOXA.
IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVAL and BOXA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer