PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVAL vs. ABCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVAL vs. ABCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IVAL having a 16.85% return and ABCS slightly lower at 16.54%.


IVAL

1D
-2.03%
1M
4.21%
6M
9.40%
YTD
16.85%
1Y
34.16%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
8.16%
ALL TIME*
6.66%

ABCS

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.51%
6M
14.48%
YTD
16.54%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$78.00K$72.55K$66.49K
$389.83K$422.74K$617.49K

IVAL vs. ABCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
16.85%34.92%-0.71%1.54%
ABCS
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF
16.54%7.95%14.47%-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between IVAL and ABCS is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023

0.56

The correlation between IVAL and ABCS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVAL vs. ABCS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVAL
ABCS

Industrials

22.0%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

21.7%
14.1%

Basic Materials

17.9%
3.4%

Energy

14.2%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.2%
4.7%

Technology

6.1%
13.8%

Healthcare

4.1%
16.9%

Communication Services

4.0%
2.0%

Financial Services

-

21.0%

Real Estate

-

4.5%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Industrials

IVAL
22.0%
ABCS
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IVAL
21.7%
ABCS
14.1%

Basic Materials

IVAL
17.9%
ABCS
3.4%

Energy

IVAL
14.2%
ABCS
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

IVAL
10.2%
ABCS
4.7%

Technology

IVAL
6.1%
ABCS
13.8%

Healthcare

IVAL
4.1%
ABCS
16.9%

Communication Services

IVAL
4.0%
ABCS
2.0%

Financial Services

IVAL

-

ABCS
21.0%

Real Estate

IVAL

-

ABCS
4.5%

Utilities

IVAL

-

ABCS
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVAL vs. ABCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IVAL
IVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ABCS
ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IVAL vs. ABCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVALABCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.32

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.90

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

9.35

+0.89

IVAL vs. ABCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the ABCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVAL and ABCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVAL vs. ABCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVAL drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than ABCS's maximum drawdown of -20.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAL and ABCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVALABCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.09%

-20.52%

-25.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-8.33%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-1.27%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.88%

-3.34%

-8.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.58%

+0.86%

Volatility

IVAL vs. ABCS - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF (IVAL) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) at 3.89%. This indicates that IVAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVALABCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

3.89%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

9.39%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

13.59%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.78%

16.91%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

16.91%

+1.70%

IVAL vs. ABCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVAL has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ABCS's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVAL vs. ABCS - Dividend Comparison

IVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than ABCS's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABCS
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF
1.12%1.37%1.39%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVAL
Alpha Architect International Quantitative Value ETF
2.61%2.75%3.60%5.15%8.00%3.95%2.07%2.51%2.93%1.73%2.02%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVAL and ABCS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVAL has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to ABCS (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVAL dropped -46.09% vs ABCS's -20.52%.

On 1-year performance, IVAL leads with 34.16% vs 25.77% for ABCS. On fees, ABCS is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, ABCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVAL has performed better with a 34.16% return vs 25.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABCS is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IVAL.

IVAL has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.12% for ABCS.

IVAL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ABCS is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IVAL and 0.27% for ABCS.

IVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVAL and ABCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer