IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE
IVAI.DE (Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF) and XNNV.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both Technology Equities funds - IVAI.DE tracks the S&P Kensho Global Artificial Intelligence Enablers Screened Index while XNNV.DE tracks the MSCI ACWI IMI Innovation Select ESG Screened 200. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IVAI.DE returned 71.74% vs 15.03% for XNNV.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVAI.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for XNNV.DE.
Performance
IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVAI.DE achieves a 38.56% return, which is significantly higher than XNNV.DE's 5.08% return.
IVAI.DE
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 19.08%
- YTD
- 38.56%
- 6M
- 34.01%
- 1Y
- 71.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNNV.DE
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 5.08%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IVAI.DE Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF | 38.56% | 15.37% | 6.83% |
XNNV.DE Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | 5.08% | 2.05% | 6.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVAI.DE and XNNV.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IVAI.DE and XNNV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IVAI.DE
XNNV.DE
IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF (IVAI.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVAI.DE | XNNV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.18 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 1.01 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 2.80 | +3.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVAI.DE | XNNV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.03 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.67 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVAI.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, which is greater than XNNV.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAI.DE and XNNV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVAI.DE | XNNV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -25.90% | -8.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.74% | -15.02% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -0.91% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -6.64% | -4.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.45% | 5.41% | +7.04% |
Volatility
IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF (IVAI.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.14% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE) at 3.84%. This indicates that IVAI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNNV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVAI.DE | XNNV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.14% | 3.84% | +7.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.25% | 10.61% | +9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.34% | 14.72% | +20.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 18.07% | +18.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 18.07% | +18.32% |
IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVAI.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XNNV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVAI.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IVAI.DE nor XNNV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IVAI.DE and XNNV.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNNV.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNNV.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IVAI.DE.
IVAI.DE tracks S&P Kensho Global Artificial Intelligence Enablers Screened Index, while XNNV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Innovation Select ESG Screened 200. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IVAI.DE and 0.30% for XNNV.DE.
Find the right allocation for IVAI.DE and XNNV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer