IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE
IVAI.DE (Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF) and XMOV.DE (Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IVAI.DE tracks the S&P Kensho Global Artificial Intelligence Enablers Screened Index while XMOV.DE tracks the Nasdaq Global Future Mobility. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IVAI.DE returned 73.80% vs 51.46% for XMOV.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVAI.DE achieves a 38.56% return, which is significantly higher than XMOV.DE's 27.31% return.
IVAI.DE
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 19.86%
- YTD
- 38.56%
- 6M
- 35.72%
- 1Y
- 73.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMOV.DE
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 27.31%
- 6M
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 51.46%
- 3Y*
- 24.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.99%
- 10Y*
- —
IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IVAI.DE Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF | 38.56% | 15.37% | 6.83% |
XMOV.DE Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF | 27.31% | 14.79% | 5.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVAI.DE and XMOV.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IVAI.DE and XMOV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IVAI.DE
XMOV.DE
IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF (IVAI.DE) and Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVAI.DE | XMOV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 4.71 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 17.12 | -11.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVAI.DE | XMOV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 2.57 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.76 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVAI.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, roughly equal to the maximum XMOV.DE drawdown of -34.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVAI.DE and XMOV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVAI.DE | XMOV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.16% | -34.78% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.74% | -10.87% | -12.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -2.17% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -7.53% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.45% | 3.00% | +9.45% |
Volatility
IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Artificial Intelligence Enablers UCITS ETF (IVAI.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.14% compared to Xtrackers Future Mobility UCITS ETF (XMOV.DE) at 8.84%. This indicates that IVAI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMOV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVAI.DE | XMOV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.14% | 8.84% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.25% | 15.94% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.34% | 19.94% | +15.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 19.34% | +17.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 20.77% | +15.62% |
IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IVAI.DE and XMOV.DE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
IVAI.DE vs. XMOV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IVAI.DE nor XMOV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IVAI.DE and XMOV.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IVAI.DE and XMOV.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
IVAI.DE tracks S&P Kensho Global Artificial Intelligence Enablers Screened Index, while XMOV.DE tracks Nasdaq Global Future Mobility. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for IVAI.DE and XMOV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer