PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF (IUSZ.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IUSZ.L is traded in USD, while WRDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the WRDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSZ.L achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than WRDA.L's 10.11% return.


IUSZ.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.42%
6M
5.64%
YTD
8.28%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*

WRDA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
6M
8.92%
YTD
10.11%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IUSZ.L
iShares MSCI USA Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF
8.28%8.58%14.66%
WRDA.L
UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.11%21.28%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSZ.L and WRDA.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024

0.75

The correlation between IUSZ.L and WRDA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSZ.L
IUSZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IUSZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

WRDA.L
WRDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF (IUSZ.L) and UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSZ.LWRDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

0.80

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.85

1.20

+5.65

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the WRDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSZ.L and WRDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSZ.L drawdown since its inception was -41.10%, which is greater than WRDA.L's maximum drawdown of -27.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSZ.L and WRDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSZ.LWRDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.10%

-27.71%

-13.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-27.71%

+19.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-15.53%

+13.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-7.46%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

18.35%

-16.03%

Volatility

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF (IUSZ.L) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that IUSZ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSZ.LWRDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

2.96%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

9.04%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

43.30%

-30.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.03%

29.74%

-11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.72%

29.74%

-9.02%

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSZ.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than WRDA.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSZ.L vs. WRDA.L - Dividend Comparison

IUSZ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while WRDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


IUSZ.L and WRDA.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IUSZ.L.

IUSZ.L tracks iShares MSCI USA Mid-Cap Equal Weight UCITS ETF, while WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IUSZ.L and 0.06% for WRDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSZ.L and WRDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer