IUSV vs. RWL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) and RWL (Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index, while RWL is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSV returned 11.91%/yr vs 14.17%/yr for RWL. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IUSV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWL.

Performance

IUSV vs. RWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than RWL's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSV has underperformed RWL with an annualized return of 11.91%, while RWL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.17% annualized return.

IUSV

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.64%
• 6M: 7.56%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 1Y: 21.41%
• 3Y*: 13.80%
• 5Y*: 11.39%
• 10Y*: 11.91%
• ALL TIME*: 11.49%

RWL

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 1.77%
• 6M: 12.44%
• YTD: 15.82%
• 1Y: 30.72%
• 3Y*: 18.60%
• 5Y*: 13.88%
• 10Y*: 14.17%
• ALL TIME*: 11.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	$60.14M	$63.62M	$70.42M
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF	$36.89M	$36.52M	$32.16M

IUSV vs. RWL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	10.38%	12.85%	12.18%	21.73%	-5.40%	25.22%	1.56%	31.47%	-9.21%	15.09%
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF	15.82%	18.65%	16.45%	17.43%	-6.00%	30.29%	9.14%	27.83%	-7.74%	20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and RWL is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2008	0.94

The correlation between IUSV and RWL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IUSV vs. RWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IUSV	RWL
Technology	20.4%	13.8%
Financial Services	16.1%	15.4%
Healthcare	11.9%	19.3%
Industrials	11.2%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	10.7%
Energy	7.3%	5.9%
Utilities	4.4%	2.6%
Real Estate	3.8%	0.9%
Basic Materials	3.6%	2.0%
Communication Services	2.7%	7.5%

Return for Risk

IUSV vs. RWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUSV

IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 85
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

RWL

RWL Risk / Return Rank: 94
RWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
RWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
RWL Omega Ratio Rank: 94
RWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RWL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUSV vs. RWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IUSV	RWL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.88	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	3.96	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.52	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	4.34	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	18.88	-6.72

IUSV vs. RWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the RWL Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and RWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. RWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, roughly equal to the maximum RWL drawdown of -54.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and RWL.

Drawdown Indicators

	IUSV	RWL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.88%	-54.83%	-2.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.36%	-6.64%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	-14.39%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.95%	-17.49%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.54%	-36.04%	-1.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-0.55%	-0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.26%	-6.40%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	1.53%	+0.11%

Volatility

IUSV vs. RWL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF (RWL) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IUSV	RWL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	2.61%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.24%	7.19%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.10%	10.02%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	14.46%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.99%	16.80%	+0.19%

IUSV vs. RWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than RWL's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

IUSV vs. RWL - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than RWL's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF	1.66%	1.78%	2.15%	1.75%	2.22%	1.87%	2.40%	2.19%	2.67%	1.93%	4.44%	7.63%
RWL Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF	1.22%	1.35%	1.43%	1.60%	1.62%	1.35%	1.75%	1.87%	1.99%	1.60%	1.71%	1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IUSV and RWL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, IUSV and RWL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IUSV or RWL?

IUSV has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to RWL (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs RWL's -54.83%.

Which ETF is better, IUSV or RWL?

On 10-year performance, RWL leads with 14.17% vs 11.91% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IUSV or RWL?

Over the 10-year period, RWL has performed better with a 14.17% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IUSV or RWL?

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IUSV or RWL?

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.22% for RWL.

What is the main difference between IUSV and RWL?

IUSV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RWL is S&P 500. IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while RWL tracks S&P 500 Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.39% for RWL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.