PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSV vs. FTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSV vs. FTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSV achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than FTA's 18.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IUSV having a 11.91% annualized return and FTA not far behind at 11.60%.


IUSV

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.64%
6M
7.56%
YTD
10.38%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
11.91%
ALL TIME*
11.49%

FTA

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.70%
6M
12.86%
YTD
18.18%
1Y
31.73%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
11.60%
ALL TIME*
8.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.06M$3.30M$2.95M
$60.14M$63.62M$70.42M

IUSV vs. FTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
10.38%12.85%12.18%21.73%-5.40%25.22%1.56%31.47%-9.21%15.09%
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
18.18%14.94%10.13%10.08%-3.73%29.32%-0.38%24.73%-13.63%18.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSV and FTA is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.89

The correlation between IUSV and FTA shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.94 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUSV vs. FTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSV
FTA

Technology

20.4%
7.3%

Financial Services

16.1%
23.2%

Healthcare

11.9%
10.2%

Industrials

11.2%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
6.5%

Energy

7.3%
9.2%

Utilities

4.4%
11.1%

Real Estate

3.8%
6.6%

Basic Materials

3.6%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.7%
4.6%

Technology

IUSV
20.4%
FTA
7.3%

Financial Services

IUSV
16.1%
FTA
23.2%

Healthcare

IUSV
11.9%
FTA
10.2%

Industrials

IUSV
11.2%
FTA
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSV
10.0%
FTA
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

IUSV
8.5%
FTA
6.5%

Energy

IUSV
7.3%
FTA
9.2%

Utilities

IUSV
4.4%
FTA
11.1%

Real Estate

IUSV
3.8%
FTA
6.6%

Basic Materials

IUSV
3.6%
FTA
3.2%

Communication Services

IUSV
2.7%
FTA
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSV vs. FTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IUSV
IUSV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IUSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FTA
FTA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTA Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IUSV vs. FTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) and First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSVFTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

5.93

-2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

20.26

-8.10

IUSV vs. FTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FTA Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSV and FTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSV vs. FTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSV drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum FTA drawdown of -62.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSV and FTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSVFTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-62.45%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-5.13%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-18.73%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-19.80%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.54%

-44.97%

+7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.56%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-8.97%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.50%

+0.14%

Volatility

IUSV vs. FTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) is 2.67%, while First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FTA) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that IUSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSVFTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.93%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

8.04%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

11.61%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

16.23%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

19.85%

-2.86%

IUSV vs. FTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FTA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IUSV vs. FTA - Dividend Comparison

IUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than FTA's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTA
First Trust Large Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.61%1.89%2.02%2.10%2.15%1.54%2.03%1.88%2.28%1.53%1.56%2.05%
IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
1.66%1.78%2.15%1.75%2.22%1.87%2.40%2.19%2.67%1.93%4.44%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSV and FTA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTA has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IUSV (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSV dropped -56.88% vs FTA's -62.45%.

On 10-year performance, IUSV leads with 11.91% vs 11.60% for FTA. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 2.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSV has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTA.

IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.61% for FTA.

IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index, while FTA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSV and 0.60% for FTA.

FTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSV and FTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer